Stability of normative data for the SF-36

Wilma H. Hopman, Claudie Berger, Lawrence Joseph, Tanveer Towheed, Elizabeth vandenKerkhof, Tassos Anastassiades, Ann Cranney, Jonathan D. Adachi, George Ioannidis, Suzette Poliquin, Jacques P. Brown, Timothy M. Murray, David A. Hanley, Emmanuel A. Papidimitropoulos, Alan Tenenhouse, Suzette Poliquin, Suzanne Godmaire, Claudie Berger, Carol Joyce, Emma SheppardSusan Kirkland, Stephanie Kaiser, Barbara Stanfield, Jacques P. Brown, Evelyne Lejeune, Tassos Anastassiades, Barbara Matthews, Nancy Kreiger, Timothy M. Murray, Barbara Gardner-Bay, Jonathan D. Adachi, Laura Pickard, Wojciech P. Olszynsjki, Jola Thingvold, Jane Allan, Kerry Siminoski, Jerilynn C. Prior, Brian Lentle, Yvette Vigna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The SF-36 is widely used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL), but with few longitudinal studies in healthy populations, it is difficult to quantify its natural history. This is important because any measure of change following an intervention may be confounded by natural changes in HRQOL. This paper assesses mean changes in SF-36 scores over a 3-year period in men and women between the ages of 40 and 59 years at baseline. Methods: Subjects were randomly selected from nine Canadian cities. Mean SF-36 changes over a 3-year period (1996/1997-1999/2000) were calculated for each gender within 5-year age categories. Multiple imputation was used to correct for potential bias due to missing data. Results: The baseline cohort included 1,974 women and 975 men between 40 and 59 years. Mean changes in HRQOL tended to be small. Women demonstrated small average declines in 22 of the 32 age and domain groupings (4 age groups, 8 SF-36 domains) while men showed declines in 14/32. Most participants stayed within 10 points of their original baseline score. Interpretation: Mean SF-36 scores change only slightly over three years in middle-aged Canadians, although there is much individual variation. It may be necessary to adjust for the natural evolution of SF-36 scores when interpreting results from longitudinal studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-391
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Public Health
Volume95
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stability of normative data for the SF-36'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this