TY - JOUR
T1 - State of the evidence for emergency medical services care of adult patients with sepsis
T2 - An analysis of research from the prehospital evidence-based practice program
AU - Greene, Jennifer
AU - Goldstein, Judah P.
AU - Lane, Daniel J.
AU - Jensen, Jan L.
AU - Leroux, Yves
AU - Swain, Janel
AU - Fidgen, Dana
AU - Brown, Ryan
AU - Simpson, Mathew
AU - Carter, Alix J.E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Paramedics Australasia. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Introduction The Prehospital Evidence-based Practice (PEP) program is an online, freely accessible, continuously updated emergency medical services evidence repository. This PEP summary describes the research evidence for the identification and management of adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. Methods A systematic search of the literature on sepsis or septic shock was conducted. Studies were scored by trained appraisers on a three-point level of evidence scale (based on study design and quality) and a three-point direction of evidence scale (supportive, neutral or opposing findings based on the studies’ primary outcome for each intervention). Results One hundred forty-three studies (80 existing and 63 new) were included for 16 interventions listed in PEP for adult patients with sepsis. The evidence matrix rank for supported interventions (n=16) were supportive-high quality (n=2, 12.5%) for crystalloid infusion and vasopressors, supportive-moderate quality (n=8, 50%) for identification tools, pre-notification, point-of-care lactate, titrated oxygen, temperature monitoring and balanced crystalloids. The benefit of pre-hospital antibiotics, colloids, Trendelenburg position and early goal-directed therapy remain inconclusive with a neutral direction of evidence. There is moderate level evidence opposing the use of high flow oxygen. Conclusion Several standard treatments are well supported by the evidence including fluid resuscitation, using balanced crystalloids, vasopressors and titrating oxygen. Tools for identifying and guiding treatment are also supported (eg. pre-notification, temperature monitoring and lactate). The evidence for antibiotic use is inconclusive. This PEP state of the evidence analysis can be used to guide selection of appropriate pre-hospital therapies during the development of pre-hospital protocols or clinical practice guidelines.
AB - Introduction The Prehospital Evidence-based Practice (PEP) program is an online, freely accessible, continuously updated emergency medical services evidence repository. This PEP summary describes the research evidence for the identification and management of adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. Methods A systematic search of the literature on sepsis or septic shock was conducted. Studies were scored by trained appraisers on a three-point level of evidence scale (based on study design and quality) and a three-point direction of evidence scale (supportive, neutral or opposing findings based on the studies’ primary outcome for each intervention). Results One hundred forty-three studies (80 existing and 63 new) were included for 16 interventions listed in PEP for adult patients with sepsis. The evidence matrix rank for supported interventions (n=16) were supportive-high quality (n=2, 12.5%) for crystalloid infusion and vasopressors, supportive-moderate quality (n=8, 50%) for identification tools, pre-notification, point-of-care lactate, titrated oxygen, temperature monitoring and balanced crystalloids. The benefit of pre-hospital antibiotics, colloids, Trendelenburg position and early goal-directed therapy remain inconclusive with a neutral direction of evidence. There is moderate level evidence opposing the use of high flow oxygen. Conclusion Several standard treatments are well supported by the evidence including fluid resuscitation, using balanced crystalloids, vasopressors and titrating oxygen. Tools for identifying and guiding treatment are also supported (eg. pre-notification, temperature monitoring and lactate). The evidence for antibiotic use is inconclusive. This PEP state of the evidence analysis can be used to guide selection of appropriate pre-hospital therapies during the development of pre-hospital protocols or clinical practice guidelines.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100582341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100582341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.33151/AJP.18.851
DO - 10.33151/AJP.18.851
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85100582341
SN - 2202-7270
VL - 18
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Australasian Journal of Paramedicine
JF - Australasian Journal of Paramedicine
ER -