Abstract
The past few years have seen the development of powerful statistical methods for detecting adaptive molecular evolution. These methods compare synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates in protein-coding genes, and regard a nonsynonymous rate elevated above the synonymous rate as evidence for darwinian selection. Numerous cases of molecular adaptation are being identified in various systems from viruses to humans. Although previous analyses averaging rates over sites and time have little power, recent methods designed to detect positive selection at individual sites and lineages have been successful. Here, we summarize recent statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation, and discuss their limitations and possible improvements.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 496-503 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Trends in Ecology and Evolution |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We thank D. Haydon, J. Mallet, T. Ohta, A. Pomiankowski, V. Vacquier, W. Swanson and three anonymous referees for comments. We also thank several users of the PAML package (http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html), in particular C. Woelk, for comments and suggestions concerning the implementation. This work is supported by grant #31/G10434 from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK).
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics