Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews

the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

460 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When faced with vaccine hesitancy, public health authorities are looking for effective strategies to address this issue. In this paper, the findings of 15 published literature reviews or meta-analysis that have examined the effectiveness of different interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy and/or to enhance vaccine acceptance are presented and discussed. From the literature, there is no strong evidence to recommend any specific intervention to address vaccine hesitancy/refusal. The reviewed studies included interventions with diverse content and approaches that were implemented in different settings and targeted various populations. Few interventions were directly targeted to vaccine hesitant individuals. Given the paucity of information on effective strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, when interventions are implemented, planning a rigorous evaluation of their impact on vaccine hesitancy/vaccine acceptance will be essential.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4191-4203
Number of pages13
JournalVaccine
Volume33
Issue number34
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 14 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • General Immunology and Microbiology
  • General Veterinary
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this