Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects

B. C. Chauhan, R. P. LeBlanc, T. A. McCormick, J. B. Rogers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

178 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using confocal scanning laser tomography, we studied the test-retest variability of topographic measurements of the optic nerve head and parapapillary retina in 30 patients with glaucoma and 30 normal control subjects. We obtained three independent images, separated by between one and six hours, centered on the optic nerve head. We condensed each original 256 x 256-pixel image to a 64 x 64-pixel image, thereby allowing a realistic estimate of the empiric 90% confidence interval of test-retest variability at each condensed pixel. Confidence interval maps generated for each subject showed highest measurement variability along the cup border and blood vessels. The mean standard deviation equivalents of test-retest variability in the patients and controls were 31.20 and 25.94 μm, respectively. These differences were statistically significant (P = .010). Variability increased with age (P < .001). When the analysis was repeated for discrete parapapillary areas, the group differences were not statistically significant (P = .100).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-15
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume118
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
From the Department of Ophthalmology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. This study was supported in part by a grant from the Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation, Halifax, Nova Scota, Canada; and grant MT-11357 from the Medical Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this