Abstract
Microbiologists are transitioning from the study and characterization of individual strains or species to the profiling of whole microbiomes and microbial ecology. Equipped with high-throughput methods for studying the taxonomic and functional characteristics of diverse samples, they are just beginning to encounter the conceptual, theoretical, and experimental problems of comparing taxonomy to (micro-ecological) function, and extracting useful measures from such comparisons (i.e. diversity, stability, or ‘‘health’’). Although still unresolved, these problems are well studied in macro-ecology (the ecology of non-microbes) and are reiterated here as an historical precautionary for microbial ecologists. Beyond expected and unresolved terminological vagueness, we argue that assessments and comparisons of taxonomic and functional profiles in micro-ecology suffer from theoretically unresolvable arbitrariness and ambiguities. We divide these into problems of scale, individuation, and commensurability. We argue that there is no technically/theo-retically ‘‘correct’’ scale, individuation, or comparison of taxonomy and function, but there are nonetheless better and worse methodologies for profiling.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1225-1243 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Biology and Philosophy |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Acknowledgements We thank Adam Martiny and an anonymous reviewer for Biology and Philosophy for their very helpful comments. G.M.D. is supported by an NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship. W.F.D. is supported by an NSERC Herzberg Medal Grant. M.G.I.L. is supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant.
Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Philosophy
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- History and Philosophy of Science