The Pharmacology of Chewable Versus Regular Carbamazepine in Chronically Treated Children With Epilepsy

Peter Camfield, Paul Hwang, Carol Camfield, Albert Fraser, Steven Soldin, ak al-Quadah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report the first comparison of Chewable and Regular Carbamazepine (CBZ) tablets in children with epilepsy. Forty-four children receiving chronic monotherapy CBZ participated. In month 1 children received regular CBZ; in month 2, the same dose of Chewable CBZ. Once per week fasting predose CBZ and CBZ epoxide serum levels were determined. In a subset of 15 children, at the end of each month serum levels were obtained every 2 hours for 12 hours beginning pre-dose. Standards for CBZ and CBZ epoxide were tested in each centre. Overall, weekly levels showed no consistent differences between the month on chewable CBZ and regular CBZ. Seizure control and rates of reported side effects were similar. In five patients chewable CBZ produced higher peak CBZ levels while five had higher peaks with regular CBZ. In conclusion, regular and chewable CBZ often have unpredictable differences in peak but not trough levels of CBZ suggesting that peak level side effects with one form of CBZ might be alleviated by changing to the other.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-207
Number of pages4
JournalCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1992
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Pharmacology of Chewable Versus Regular Carbamazepine in Chronically Treated Children With Epilepsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this