Validity and reliability of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-20 questionnaire as a measure of quality of life in elderly people living at home

Daniel J. Carver, Chere A. Chapman, Vince Salazar Thomas, Karen J. Stadnyk, Kenneth Rockwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-20 (SF-20) questionnaire is recommended for health-related quality of life research, but there is little information on its utility in older people. We assessed the validity, reliability and feasibility of using the SF-20 in an elderly community-dwelling population. Methods: the SF-20 was administered to a stratified, random sample of 333 elderly subjects. Findings: assessment of content validity revealed that important domains were lacking, while others appeared to be inappropriately combined. Using Spearman correlation coefficients, the SF-20 had acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. A principal components analysis provided evidence for internal consistency for some of the subscales. Evidence for test-retest reliability was good. Interpretation: while the reliability and feasibility of the SF-20 appear satisfactory, concerns about validity and responsiveness should temper enthusiasm for its use with elderly people living at home.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-174
Number of pages6
JournalAge and Ageing
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ageing
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity and reliability of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-20 questionnaire as a measure of quality of life in elderly people living at home'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this