What, if anything, does amenable mortality tell us about regional health system Performance?

M. Ruth Lavergne, Kimberlyn McGrail

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Amenable mortality is proposed as a health system performance measure, and has been used in comparisons across countries and socio-economic strata. We assess its utility as a health region-level indicator in Canada. Approach: We classified all deaths in British Columbia from 2002 to 2009 using two common definitions of amenable mortality. Counts and standardized rates were calculated for 16 health regions. To assess reliability, sensitivity and validity, we compared rates across regions and over time, and examined correlations with premature and all-cause mortality. Results: Of the 238,849 deaths in the study period, 6.6% or 13.7% were classified as amenable (depending on the definition used). Rates were stable or falling in more populated regions, but unstable with large confidence intervals elsewhere. Correlation with overall mortality was strong. Conclusion: Though amenable mortality is appealing as a feasible, understandable indicator, we question whether it is appropriate for comparisons at a subprovincial level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-90
Number of pages12
JournalHealthcare Policy
Volume8
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What, if anything, does amenable mortality tell us about regional health system Performance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this