What would make a definition of frailty successful?

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

289 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At present, frailty is defined variably. Some consensus on a definition is likely to emerge, but the basis for a successful definition needs to be explored. Here, a classic approach to validation is proposed: a successful definition of frailty should be multifactorial but must also manage the many factors in a way that takes their interactions into account. It is likely to be correlated with disability, co-morbidity and self-rated health, and should identify a group that is vulnerable to adverse outcomes. Ideally, it should also be susceptible to animal modelling. In that frailty and age are so bound together, it is also likely that there will be some age at which virtually all people will be frail, by any definition. Apart from being valid, the success of any definition of frailty will depend on it being useful to researchers and clinicians. The need for progress on our understanding of frailty is evident, but for now, there is insufficient evidence to accept a single definition of frailty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)432-434
Number of pages3
JournalAge and Ageing
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2005

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
K.R. is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) through an Investigator award and by the Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation as the Kathryn Allen Weldon Professor of Alzheimer Research.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ageing
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What would make a definition of frailty successful?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this