Where does open science lead us during a pandemic? a public good argument to prioritise rights in the open commons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, open science has become central to experimental, public health and clinical responses across the globe. Open science is described as an open commons, in which a right to science avails all possible scientific data for everyone to access and use. In this common space, capitalist platforms now provide many essential services and are taking the lead in public health activities. These neoliberal businesses, however, have a central role in the capture of public goods. This paper argues that the open commons is a community of rights, consisting of people and institutions whose interests mutually support the public good. If OS is a cornerstone of public health, then reaffirming the public good is its overriding purpose, and unethical platforms ought to be excluded from the commons and its benefits.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health Policy

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Where does open science lead us during a pandemic? a public good argument to prioritise rights in the open commons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this