A call for comparative effectiveness research to learn whether routine clinical care decisions can protect from dementia and cognitive decline

Penny A. Dacks, Joshua J. Armstrong, Stephen K. Brannan, Aaron J. Carman, Allan M. Green, M. Sue Kirkman, Lawrence R. Krakoff, Lewis H. Kuller, Lenore J. Launer, Simon Lovestone, Elizabeth Merikle, Peter J. Neumann, Kenneth Rockwood, Diana W. Shineman, Richard G. Stefanacci, Priscilla Velentgas, Anand Viswanathan, Rachel A. Whitmer, Jeff D. Williamson, Howard M. Fillit

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículo de revisiónrevisión exhaustiva

11 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Common diseases like diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation are probable risk factors for dementia, suggesting that their treatments may influence the risk and rate of cognitive and functional decline. Moreover, specific therapies and medications may affect long-term brain health through mechanisms that are independent of their primary indication. While surgery, benzodiazepines, and anti-cholinergic drugs may accelerate decline or even raise the risk of dementia, other medications act directly on the brain to potentially slow the pathology that underlies Alzheimer's and other dementia. In other words, the functional and cognitive decline in vulnerable patients may be influenced by the choice of treatments for other medical conditions. Despite the importance of these questions, very little research is available. The Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation convened an advisory panel to discuss the existing evidence and to recommend strategies to accelerate the development of comparative effectiveness research on how choices in the clinical care of common chronic diseases may protect from cognitive decline and dementia.

Idioma originalEnglish
Número de artículo200
PublicaciónAlzheimer's Research and Therapy
Volumen8
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublished - ago. 20 2016

Nota bibliográfica

Funding Information:
This position paper and the corresponding advisory panel were funded by the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation. Support for authors’ time was provided by the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (JJA); the Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, NIH (LJL); NIH-NIA grants K23 AG028726 and R01AG047975 (AV). Takeda Pharmaceuticals provided some support for the advisory panel; the American Heart Association supported the cost of travel for their representative (AV).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Author(s).

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'A call for comparative effectiveness research to learn whether routine clinical care decisions can protect from dementia and cognitive decline'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto

Dacks, P. A., Armstrong, J. J., Brannan, S. K., Carman, A. J., Green, A. M., Kirkman, M. S., Krakoff, L. R., Kuller, L. H., Launer, L. J., Lovestone, S., Merikle, E., Neumann, P. J., Rockwood, K., Shineman, D. W., Stefanacci, R. G., Velentgas, P., Viswanathan, A., Whitmer, R. A., Williamson, J. D., & Fillit, H. M. (2016). A call for comparative effectiveness research to learn whether routine clinical care decisions can protect from dementia and cognitive decline. Alzheimer's Research and Therapy, 8(1), Artículo 200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-016-0200-3