Accessibility from the patient perspective: Comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments

Jeanie L. Haggerty, Jean Frédéric Lévesque, Darcy A. Santor, Frederick Burge, Christine Beaulieu, Fatima Bouharaoui, Marie Dominique Beaulieu, Raynald Pineault, David Gass

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

37 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The operational definition of first-contact accessibility is "the ease with which a person can obtain needed care (including advice and support) from the practitioner of choice within a time frame appropriate to the urgency of the problem"; accommodation is "the way healthcare resources are organized to accommodate a wide range of patients' abilities to contact healthcare providers and reach healthcare services, that is to say telephone services, flexible appointment systems, hours of operation, and walk-in periods."Objective: To compare how well accessibility is measured in validated subscales that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient's perspective. Method: 645 adults with at least one healthcare contact in the previous 12 months responded to six instruments that evaluate primary healthcare with four subscales that measure accessibility: the Primary Care Assessment Survey (PCAS), the Primary Care Assessment Tool - Short Form (PCAT-S, two subscales) and the first version of the EUROPEP (EUROPEP-I). Scores were normalized to a 0-to-10 scale for descriptive comparison. Exploratory and confirmatory (structural equation modelling) factor analysis examined fit to operational definition, and item response theory analysis examined item performance on common constructs. Results: The subscales demonstrate similar psychometric measures to those reported by developers. The PCAT-S First-Contact Utilization subscale does not fit the accessibility construct. The remaining three subscales load reasonably onto a single factor, presumed to be accessibility, but the best-fitting model has two factors: "timeliness of obtaining needed care" (PCAT-S First-Contact Access, some EUROPEP-I items) and "how resources are organized to accommodate clients" (PCAS Organizational Access and most of EUROPEP-I organization of care). Items in the PCAS and PCAT-S subscales have good discriminability. Conclusion: Only three of the four subscales measure accessibility; all are appropriate for use in Canada. The PCAT-S First-Contact Access subscale is the best measure for first-contact accessibility, and PCAS Organizational Accessibility has good metric properties and measures for accommodation.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)94-107
Número de páginas14
PublicaciónHealthcare Policy
Volumen7
N.ºSPEC. ISSUE
EstadoPublished - dic. 2011

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Accessibility from the patient perspective: Comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto