TY - JOUR
T1 - Adopting the New Anticoagulants
T2 - All Aboard or All in Good Time?
AU - Deyell, Marc W.
AU - Cox, Jafna L.
AU - Bennett, Matthew T.
AU - Wong, Graham C.
AU - Teal, Phillip A.
AU - Krahn, Andrew D.
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - At last there is now more than 1 oral anticoagulant (OAC) available for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Though more choice is a good thing, it does mandate knowing which drug is the most appropriate in a given clinical situation. Three novel OACs-dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban-are approved for use in atrial fibrillation in Canada. They have each been evaluated in large, randomized controlled trials where they have been shown to be noninferior, or in some cases superior, to warfarin (Coumadin). Prescription coverage for these drugs is increasingly available through third party and government drug plans. The major enhancements of the novel OACs relate to their rapid, consistent anticoagulant effect at fixed dosing and the lack of need formonitoring of anticoagulant effect. Nonetheless, their use is not foolproof and practitioners must be familiar with their limitations. On balance, we favour the use of novel OACs over warfarin in patients who are anticoagulant-naive, given their increased ease of use. However, we advocate switching from warfarin only if international normalized ratio control has been poor or if frequent monitoring is problematic.
AB - At last there is now more than 1 oral anticoagulant (OAC) available for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Though more choice is a good thing, it does mandate knowing which drug is the most appropriate in a given clinical situation. Three novel OACs-dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban-are approved for use in atrial fibrillation in Canada. They have each been evaluated in large, randomized controlled trials where they have been shown to be noninferior, or in some cases superior, to warfarin (Coumadin). Prescription coverage for these drugs is increasingly available through third party and government drug plans. The major enhancements of the novel OACs relate to their rapid, consistent anticoagulant effect at fixed dosing and the lack of need formonitoring of anticoagulant effect. Nonetheless, their use is not foolproof and practitioners must be familiar with their limitations. On balance, we favour the use of novel OACs over warfarin in patients who are anticoagulant-naive, given their increased ease of use. However, we advocate switching from warfarin only if international normalized ratio control has been poor or if frequent monitoring is problematic.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884586564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884586564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.03.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 23747017
AN - SCOPUS:84884586564
SN - 0828-282X
VL - 29
SP - 1295
EP - 1298
JO - Canadian Journal of Cardiology
JF - Canadian Journal of Cardiology
IS - 10
ER -