An evidence-based manual for abdominal paracentesis

Angela McGibbon, Grant I. Chen, Kevork M. Peltekian, Sander Veldhuyzen Van Zanten

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículo de revisiónrevisión exhaustiva

57 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The purpose of this study was to provide evidence-based approaches to detect ascites, perform paracentesis, order tests, and interpret the results. A Medline search was performed to identify relevant articles. Of 731 identified articles, 50 articles were used. The most sensitive findings for ascites detection are ankle edema (93%), increased abdominal girth (87%), flank dullness (84%), and bulging flanks (81%). Paracentesis is safe, with bleeding rates and leakage of <1%. An ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cell count ≥250 cells/mm3 is the most sensitive test (86%-100%) to diagnose spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is the most useful test in identifying portal hypertension-related ascites. Large-volume paracentesis is effective in the treatment of refractory ascites. We conclude that paracentesis is a safe and vital procedure in patients with new-onset ascites. Once detected, an algorithmic approach to ordering tests and their interpretation is useful to determine etiology and direct further management.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)3307-3315
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónDigestive Diseases and Sciences
Volumen52
N.º12
DOI
EstadoPublished - dic. 2007

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Physiology
  • Gastroenterology

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'An evidence-based manual for abdominal paracentesis'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto