And they call this progress? consequences for young people of living and working in resource-extraction communities

Communities dependent on natural resource extraction (e.g. oil/gas, mining) are routinely exposed to rhetoric that associates notions of progress (including health and social welfare) with a booming economy. These places frequently experience demographic and social disruptions associated with reliance on resource-extraction sectors (e.g. the influx of young male workers and money, increasing rates of drug/alcohol consumption, infrastructural shortfalls). However, research regarding the problematic health and social impacts associated with resource-extraction booms are markedly absent from contemporary research pertaining to high-income countries. This paper investigates how an economic boom is perceived to affect young people's health and social well-being in Fort St. John, a booming oil/gas community in British Columbia, Canada. We conducted ethnographic fieldwork (8 weeks), including in-depth interviews with 25 young people (ages 15-25) and 14 health and social service providers. Participants identified education, addictions, and housing as key areas where the negative consequences of living and working in an oil/gas community have affected them the most. The findings illustrate the fallacy of the colloquialism that 'the only drawback to a boom is a bust'. While the issues presented have substantial public health implications, they are generated by - and can be addressed via - sectors outside public health. Partnerships between resource-extraction companies, public health, and community organizations offer innovative and feasible opportunities to address these problems.