TY - JOUR
T1 - Are youtube seizure videos misleading? Neurologists do not always agree
AU - Brna, P. M.
AU - Dooley, J. M.
AU - Esser, M. J.
AU - Perry, M. S.
AU - Gordon, K. E.
PY - 2013/11
Y1 - 2013/11
N2 - The internet has become the first stop for the public and patients to seek health-related information. Video-sharing websites are particularly important sources of information for those seeking answers about seizures and epilepsy. Because of the widespread popularity of YouTube, we sought to explore whether a seizure diagnosis and classification could reliably be applied. All videos related to "seizures" were reviewed, and irrelevant videos were excluded. The remaining 162 nonduplicate videos were analyzed by 4 independent pediatric neurologists who classified the events as epilepsy seizures, nonepileptic seizures, or indeterminate. Videos designated as epilepsy seizures were then classified into focal, generalized, or unclassified. At least 3 of the 4 reviewers agreed that 35% of the videos showed that the events were "epilepsy seizures", at least 3 of the 4 reviewers agreed that 28% of the videos demonstrated that the events were "nonepileptic seizures", and there was good agreement that 7% of the videos showed that the event was "indeterminate". Overall, interrater agreement was moderate at k. = 0.57 for epilepsy seizures and k. =0.43 for nonepileptic seizures. For seizure classification, reviewer agreement was greatest for "generalized seizures" (k. =0.45) and intermediate for "focal seizures" (k. =0.27), and there was no agreement for unclassified events (k. =0.026, p. =0.2). Overall, neurology reviewer agreement suggests that only approximately one-third of the videos designated as "seizures" on the most popular video-sharing website, YouTube, definitely depict a seizure. Caution should be exercised in the use of such online video media for accessing educational or self-diagnosis aids for seizures.
AB - The internet has become the first stop for the public and patients to seek health-related information. Video-sharing websites are particularly important sources of information for those seeking answers about seizures and epilepsy. Because of the widespread popularity of YouTube, we sought to explore whether a seizure diagnosis and classification could reliably be applied. All videos related to "seizures" were reviewed, and irrelevant videos were excluded. The remaining 162 nonduplicate videos were analyzed by 4 independent pediatric neurologists who classified the events as epilepsy seizures, nonepileptic seizures, or indeterminate. Videos designated as epilepsy seizures were then classified into focal, generalized, or unclassified. At least 3 of the 4 reviewers agreed that 35% of the videos showed that the events were "epilepsy seizures", at least 3 of the 4 reviewers agreed that 28% of the videos demonstrated that the events were "nonepileptic seizures", and there was good agreement that 7% of the videos showed that the event was "indeterminate". Overall, interrater agreement was moderate at k. = 0.57 for epilepsy seizures and k. =0.43 for nonepileptic seizures. For seizure classification, reviewer agreement was greatest for "generalized seizures" (k. =0.45) and intermediate for "focal seizures" (k. =0.27), and there was no agreement for unclassified events (k. =0.026, p. =0.2). Overall, neurology reviewer agreement suggests that only approximately one-third of the videos designated as "seizures" on the most popular video-sharing website, YouTube, definitely depict a seizure. Caution should be exercised in the use of such online video media for accessing educational or self-diagnosis aids for seizures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885031381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885031381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.08.003
DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.08.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 24035669
AN - SCOPUS:84885031381
SN - 1525-5050
VL - 29
SP - 305
EP - 307
JO - Epilepsy and Behavior
JF - Epilepsy and Behavior
IS - 2
ER -