Blood pressure reactivity to an anger provocation interview does not predict incident cardiovascular disease events: The Canadian Nova Scotia health survey (NSHS95) prospective population study

Jonathan A. Shaffer, Lauren Taggart Wasson, Karina W. Davidson, Joseph E. Schwartz, Susan Kirkland, Daichi Shimbo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

6 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

We examined the association between blood pressure (BP) reactivity to an anger provocation interview and 10-year incident CVD events in 1,470 adults from the population-based 1995 Nova Scotia Health Survey (NSHS95). In an unadjusted model, those in the highest decile of systolic BP reactivity were more than twice as likely to have an incident CVD event compared to those in the decile with no reactivity (HR = 2.33, 95 CI = 1.15 - 4.69, P = 0.02). However, after adjusting for age and sex, and then also for Framingham risk score, body mass index, and education, this relationship was attenuated and not statistically significant. Diastolic BP reactivity was not associated with CVD incidence in any model. Individual differences in BP reactivity to a laboratory-induced, structured anger provocation interview may not play a major role in clinical CVD endpoints.

Idioma originalEnglish
Número de artículo658128
PublicaciónInternational Journal of Hypertension
Volumen2012
DOI
EstadoPublished - 2012

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Internal Medicine

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Blood pressure reactivity to an anger provocation interview does not predict incident cardiovascular disease events: The Canadian Nova Scotia health survey (NSHS95) prospective population study'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto