TY - JOUR
T1 - Choosing Wisely Canada cancer list
T2 - Ten low-value or harmful practices that should be avoided in cancer care
AU - Mitera, Gunita
AU - Earle, Craig
AU - Latosinsky, Steven
AU - Booth, Christopher
AU - Bezjak, Andrea
AU - Desbiens, Christine
AU - Delouya, Guila
AU - Laing, Kara
AU - Camuso, Natasha
AU - Porter, Geoff
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - Purpose: Choosing Wisely Canada, modeled after Choosing Wisely in the United States, is intended to identify low-value or potentially harmful practices relevant to the Canadian health care environment. Our objective was to use multidisciplinary, pan-Canadian, physician-based consensus to identify a list of lowvalue or harmful cancer practices frequently used in Canada. Methods: A Task Force convened by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer included physician representation from the Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology, Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists, and Canadian Associationof Radiation Oncology, and an expert advisor. The methodology included four phases: identify potentially relevant items, develop a long list, refine and reduce the long list to a short list, and select and endorse a final list. A framework-driven consensus process and a series of electronic surveys and voting processes were used to capture consensus. Results: Sixty-six potentially relevant cancer-related practices were identified. The long list (41 practices) was reduced to a short list of 19 practices. Of the 10 practices on the final list, five are completely new, and five are revisions or adaptations of practices from previous US society lists. Six of the 10 involve multiple disease sites, and four are disease-site specific. One relates to diagnosis, six relate to treatment, two relate to surveillance/survivorship, and one practice spans the cancer care continuum. Conclusion: The cancer list was developed in partnership with the Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology, Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists, and Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology. Using knowledge translation and exchange efforts, this list should empower patients with cancer and physicians to assist in a targeted conversation about the appropriateness and quality of individual patient care.
AB - Purpose: Choosing Wisely Canada, modeled after Choosing Wisely in the United States, is intended to identify low-value or potentially harmful practices relevant to the Canadian health care environment. Our objective was to use multidisciplinary, pan-Canadian, physician-based consensus to identify a list of lowvalue or harmful cancer practices frequently used in Canada. Methods: A Task Force convened by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer included physician representation from the Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology, Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists, and Canadian Associationof Radiation Oncology, and an expert advisor. The methodology included four phases: identify potentially relevant items, develop a long list, refine and reduce the long list to a short list, and select and endorse a final list. A framework-driven consensus process and a series of electronic surveys and voting processes were used to capture consensus. Results: Sixty-six potentially relevant cancer-related practices were identified. The long list (41 practices) was reduced to a short list of 19 practices. Of the 10 practices on the final list, five are completely new, and five are revisions or adaptations of practices from previous US society lists. Six of the 10 involve multiple disease sites, and four are disease-site specific. One relates to diagnosis, six relate to treatment, two relate to surveillance/survivorship, and one practice spans the cancer care continuum. Conclusion: The cancer list was developed in partnership with the Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology, Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists, and Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology. Using knowledge translation and exchange efforts, this list should empower patients with cancer and physicians to assist in a targeted conversation about the appropriateness and quality of individual patient care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929672075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929672075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JOP.2015.004325
DO - 10.1200/JOP.2015.004325
M3 - Article
C2 - 25980018
AN - SCOPUS:84929672075
SN - 1554-7477
VL - 11
SP - e296-e303
JO - Journal of Oncology Practice
JF - Journal of Oncology Practice
IS - 3
ER -