TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative analysis of abundance–occupancy relationships for species at risk at both broad taxonomic and spatial scales
AU - Roney, Nancy E.
AU - Kuparinen, Anna
AU - Hutchings, Jeffrey A.
PY - 2015/5/2
Y1 - 2015/5/2
N2 - The abundance–occupancy relationship is one of the most well-examined relationships in ecology. At the species level, a positive association has been widely documented. However, until recently, research on the nature of this relationship at broad taxonomic and spatial scales has been limited. Here, we perform a comparative analysis of 12 taxonomic groups across a large spatial scale (Canada), using data on Canadian species at risk: amphibians, arthropods, birds, freshwater fishes, lichens, marine fishes, marine mammals, molluscs, mosses, reptiles, terrestrial mammals, and vascular plants. We find a significantly positive relationship in all taxonomic groups with the exception of freshwater fishes (negative association) and lichens (no association). In general, our work underscores the strength and breadth of this apparently fundamental relationship and provides insight into novel applications for large-scale population dynamics. Further development of species-independent abundance–occupancy relationships, or those of a similar nature, might well prove instrumental in serving as starting points for developing speciesindependent reference points and recovery strategies.
AB - The abundance–occupancy relationship is one of the most well-examined relationships in ecology. At the species level, a positive association has been widely documented. However, until recently, research on the nature of this relationship at broad taxonomic and spatial scales has been limited. Here, we perform a comparative analysis of 12 taxonomic groups across a large spatial scale (Canada), using data on Canadian species at risk: amphibians, arthropods, birds, freshwater fishes, lichens, marine fishes, marine mammals, molluscs, mosses, reptiles, terrestrial mammals, and vascular plants. We find a significantly positive relationship in all taxonomic groups with the exception of freshwater fishes (negative association) and lichens (no association). In general, our work underscores the strength and breadth of this apparently fundamental relationship and provides insight into novel applications for large-scale population dynamics. Further development of species-independent abundance–occupancy relationships, or those of a similar nature, might well prove instrumental in serving as starting points for developing speciesindependent reference points and recovery strategies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936884691&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936884691&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1139/cjz-2014-0318
DO - 10.1139/cjz-2014-0318
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84936884691
SN - 0008-4301
VL - 93
SP - 515
EP - 519
JO - Canadian Journal of Zoology
JF - Canadian Journal of Zoology
IS - 7
ER -