Resumen
Despite the recognized benefits of sexual expression and its importance in the lives of people living with dementia, research demonstrates that there are multiple barriers to its positive expression (e.g., expression that is pleasurable and free of coercion, discrimination, and violence) in RLTC homes. These barriers constitute a form of discrimination based on age and ability, and violate the rights of persons living with dementia to dignity, autonomy, and participation in everyday life and society. Drawing on a human rights approach to dementia and sexual expression, we explored the experiences of diverse professionals, family members, and persons living with dementia with explicit attention to the ways in which macro-level dynamics are influencing the support, or lack thereof, for sexual expression at the micro level. Focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted with 27 participants, and the collected data were analyzed thematically. While all participants acknowledged that intimacy and sexual expression of persons living with dementia should be supported, rarely is such expression supported in practice. Micro-level factors included negative attitudes of professionals toward sexual expression by persons living with dementia, their discomfort with facilitating intimacy and sexual expression in the context of their professional roles, their anxieties regarding potential negative reactions from family members, and concerns about sanctions for failing to prevent abuse. In our analysis, we importantly trace these micro-level factors to macro-level factors. The latter include the cultural stigma associated with dementia, ageism, ableism, and erotophobia, all of which are reproduced in, and reinforced by, professionals’ education, as well as legal and professional standards that exclusively focus on managing and safeguarding residents from abuse. Our analysis demonstrates a complexity that has enormous potential to inform future research that is critically needed for the development of educational initiatives and to promote policy changes in this area.
Idioma original | English |
---|---|
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 1077-1097 |
Número de páginas | 21 |
Publicación | Dementia |
Volumen | 21 |
N.º | 4 |
DOI | |
Estado | Published - may. 2022 |
Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
Nota bibliográfica
Funding Information:We wish to express our gratitude to the Alzheimer Society of Toronto and Dementia Advocacy Canada for their collaboration. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the Women’s College Hospital Women’s Xchange 15K Challenge Grant. Dr Alisa Grigorovich also gratefully acknowledges postdoctoral funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Health System Impact Fellowship).
Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the Women’s College Hospital Women’s Xchange 15K Challenge Grant. Dr Alisa Grigorovich also gratefully acknowledges postdoctoral funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Health System Impact Fellowship).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Social Sciences
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article