TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a patient-centred, evidence-based and consensus-based discharge care bundle for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
AU - the COPD PRIHS-2 Group
AU - Ospina, Maria B.
AU - Michas, Marta
AU - Deuchar, Lesly
AU - Leigh, Richard
AU - Bhutani, Mohit
AU - Rowe, Brian H.
AU - Marciniuk, Darcy
AU - Goodridge, Donna
AU - Dechman, Gail
AU - Bourbeau, Jean
AU - Balter, Meyer
AU - Camp, Pat
AU - Hernandez, Paul
AU - Goldstein, Roger S.
AU - Stickland, Michael K.
AU - Damant, Ron
AU - Mayers, Irvin
AU - Hall, Jerry
AU - Green, Lee
AU - Yan, Charles
AU - Pendharkar, Sachin
AU - Mody, Chris
AU - Field, Stephen
AU - Walker, Brandie
AU - Lohman, Tara
AU - Roman, Michael
AU - Graham, Jim
AU - Farris, Peter
AU - Ryan, Allan
AU - Mrklas, Kelly
AU - Dubois, Roberta
N1 - Funding Information:
competing interests BHR's research is supported by a Tier I Canada Research Chair in Evidence-based Emergency Medicine from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) through the Government of Canada.
Funding Information:
Funding The study was funded by Alberta Innovates Health Solutions Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Health System Program; (AIHS PRIHS 201400390); Alberta Health Services.
Publisher Copyright:
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Introduction Hospital and emergency department discharge for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often poorly organised. We developed a patient-centred, evidence-based and consensus-based discharge care bundle for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Methods A purposeful sample of clinicians and patients were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi study (July-November 2015). In round 1, participants rated on a seven-point Likert scale (1=not at all important; 7=extremely important) the importance of 29 unique COPD care actions. Round 2 comprised items selected from round 1 based on consensus (>80% endorsement for Likert values 5-7). A list of 18 care items from round 2 was discussed in a face-to-face nominal group meeting. Results Seven care items were included in the COPD discharge bundle based on clinician and patient input: (1) ensure adequate inhaler technique is demonstrated; (2) send discharge summary to family physician and arrange follow-up; (3) optimise and reconcile prescription of respiratory medications; (4) provide a written discharge management plan and assess patient's and caregiver's comprehension of discharge instructions; (5) refer to pulmonary rehabilitation; (6) screen for frailty and comorbidities; and (7) assess smoking status, provide counselling and refer to smoking cessation programme. Conclusion We present a seven-item, patient-centred, evidence-based and consensus-based discharge bundle for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Alignment with clinical practice guidelines and feasibility of local adaptations of the bundle should be explored to facilitate wide applicability and evaluation of the effectiveness of the COPD discharge bundle.
AB - Introduction Hospital and emergency department discharge for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often poorly organised. We developed a patient-centred, evidence-based and consensus-based discharge care bundle for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Methods A purposeful sample of clinicians and patients were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi study (July-November 2015). In round 1, participants rated on a seven-point Likert scale (1=not at all important; 7=extremely important) the importance of 29 unique COPD care actions. Round 2 comprised items selected from round 1 based on consensus (>80% endorsement for Likert values 5-7). A list of 18 care items from round 2 was discussed in a face-to-face nominal group meeting. Results Seven care items were included in the COPD discharge bundle based on clinician and patient input: (1) ensure adequate inhaler technique is demonstrated; (2) send discharge summary to family physician and arrange follow-up; (3) optimise and reconcile prescription of respiratory medications; (4) provide a written discharge management plan and assess patient's and caregiver's comprehension of discharge instructions; (5) refer to pulmonary rehabilitation; (6) screen for frailty and comorbidities; and (7) assess smoking status, provide counselling and refer to smoking cessation programme. Conclusion We present a seven-item, patient-centred, evidence-based and consensus-based discharge bundle for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Alignment with clinical practice guidelines and feasibility of local adaptations of the bundle should be explored to facilitate wide applicability and evaluation of the effectiveness of the COPD discharge bundle.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042885031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042885031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000265
DO - 10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000265
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85042885031
SN - 2052-4439
VL - 5
JO - BMJ Open Respiratory Research
JF - BMJ Open Respiratory Research
IS - 1
M1 - 000265
ER -