Resumen
Frameworks of ecosystem services (ES) are promoted as a new and important way to recognize, understand, and account for nature's benefits. We questioned assertions of the novelty of ES ideas and conducted a comparative analysis of approaches in planning, landscape architecture, and sustainable forest management against the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment ES framework. We conclude that the newer Millennium Ecosystem Assessment ES framing may assist planners in connecting local land-use change to human well-being, assessing trade-offs, and accounting for future uncertainty. Analogous approaches such as sustainable forest management offer practical insights, for example, about gauging, guiding, and reporting on sustainable use of ecosystems. We encourage environmental planners to engage with ES researchers to develop the approach and advance planning practice.
Idioma original | English |
---|---|
Páginas | 306-320 |
Número de páginas | 15 |
Volumen | 65 |
N.º | 3 |
Publicación especializada | Canadian Geographer / Geographie Canadien |
DOI | |
Estado | Published - sep. 1 2021 |
Nota bibliográfica
Funding Information:This research was funded by a Nova Scotia Graduate Scholarship, and by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada via the Doctoral Fellowships Program. The authors would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their critiques and suggestions, which helped to improve the paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Canadian Association of Geographers / L'Association canadienne des géographes
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Earth-Surface Processes