Resumen
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injection, as monotherapy or in combination with laser, with laser monotherapy in patients with visual impairment caused by diabetic macular edema. Design Twelve-month, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, active-control study. Participants A total of 220 (ranibizumab monotherapy: n = 75, ranibizumab + laser: n = 73, laser monotherapy: n = 72) patients with a diagnosis of type I or II diabetes and visual impairment caused by macular edema were included in the efficacy analysis. Methods Ranibizumab was initiated with a fixed loading phase of 3 monthly injections followed by as needed therapy until stable vision achievement. Efficacy end points were the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in central retinal thickness (CRT) measured by optical coherence tomography, proportion achieving a 15-letter BCVA gain, and 12-month Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) score. Safety was assessed with the incidence and severity of adverse events. Results At 12 months, significant (p < 0.001) mean BCVA improvements were observed for both the ranibizumab monotherapy (+8.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.0-10.7] letters) and the ranibizumab + laser (+8.2 [95% CI 6.0-10.4] letters) groups compared with the laser monotherapy group (+0.3 [95% CI -2.9 to 3.5] letters). Similarly, a better response in terms of CRT improvement, BCVA letter gain, and VFQ-25 was observed in both ranibizumab groups compared with laser monotherapy. The safety profile was comparable in the 2 ranibizumab groups. Conclusions Ranibizumab as monotherapy or combined with laser resulted in significantly higher improvements in visual acuity and vision-related quality of life at month 12 as compared with laser monotherapy.
Idioma original | English |
---|---|
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 209-216 |
Número de páginas | 8 |
Publicación | Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology |
Volumen | 50 |
N.º | 3 |
DOI | |
Estado | Published - jun. 1 2015 |
Nota bibliográfica
Funding Information:Supported by: The study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
Funding Information:
A.B. has served on advisory boards for Novartis, Bayer, Alcon, and Allergan; his institution has received research funding from Novartis and fellowship funding from Novartis, Alcon, and Bayer. T.S. has been a member of advisory boards for Novartis, Bayer, and Alcon and has received research grant-in-aid funding from Novartis (>2 years ago) and QLT (>5 years ago). A.C. has served on advisory boards for Novartis, Alcon, and Bayer and has participated in company-sponsored clinical trials. J.-D.A. has no conflicts of interest. A.-S.C. and F.d.T. are employees of Novartis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Ophthalmology