TY - GEN
T1 - Evaluating qualitative research
T2 - 12th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2006
AU - Tingling, Peter
AU - Beaubien, Louis
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Despite a well-established tradition within the information systems discipline and wider management investigations, researchers are frequently required to remind if not educate reviewers as to how qualitative research should be evaluated. This paper reviews and discusses criteria that have been proposed for grounded theory, ethnographic, confessional, postmodern, and interpretive and positivist case studies.
AB - Despite a well-established tradition within the information systems discipline and wider management investigations, researchers are frequently required to remind if not educate reviewers as to how qualitative research should be evaluated. This paper reviews and discusses criteria that have been proposed for grounded theory, ethnographic, confessional, postmodern, and interpretive and positivist case studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870383686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870383686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84870383686
SN - 9781604236262
T3 - Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, AMCIS 2006
SP - 3626
EP - 3635
BT - Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, AMCIS 2006
Y2 - 4 August 2006 through 6 August 2006
ER -