Failure of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis: Risk factors in medical-surgical critically Ill patients

Wendy Lim, Maureen Meade, Francois Lauzier, Ryan Zarychanski, Sangeeta Mehta, Francois Lamontagne, Peter Dodek, Lauralyn McIntyre, Richard Hall, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Robert Fowler, Menaka Pai, Gordon Guyatt, Mark A. Crowther, Theodore E. Warkentin, P. J. Devereaux, Stephen D. Walter, John Muscedere, Margaret Herridge, Alexis F. TurgeonWilliam Geerts, Simon Finfer, Michael Jacka, Otavio Berwanger, Marlies Ostermann, Ismael Qushmaq, Jan O. Friedrich, Deborah J. Cook

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

102 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Objectives: To identify risk factors for failure of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients in the ICU. Design: Multivariable regression analysis of thrombosis predictors from a randomized thromboprophylaxis trial. Setting: Sixty-seven medical-surgical ICUs in six countries. Patients: Three thousand seven hundred forty-six medical-surgical critically ill patients. Interventions: All patients received anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin at standard doses. Measurements and Main Results: Independent predictors for venous thromboembolism, proximal leg deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism developing during critical illness were assessed. A total of 289 patients (7.7%) developed venous thromboembolism. Predictors of thromboprophylaxis failure as measured by development of venous thromboembolism included a personal or family history of venous thromboembolism (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.03-2.59; p = 0.04) and body mass index (hazard ratio, 1.18 per 10-point increase; 95% CI, 1.04-1.35; p = 0.01). Increasing body mass index was also a predictor for developing proximal leg deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.46; p = 0.007), which occurred in 182 patients (4.9%). Pulmonary embolism occurred in 47 patients (1.3%) and was associated with body mass index (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.02-1.83; p = 0.035) and vasopressor use (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.01-3.35; p = 0.046). Low-molecular-weight heparin (in comparison to unfractionated heparin) thromboprophylaxis lowered pulmonary embolism risk (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.95; p = 0.034) while statin use in the preceding week lowered the risk of proximal leg deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.77; p = 0.004). Conclusions: Failure of standard thromboprophylaxis using lowmolecular- weight heparin or unfractionated heparin is more likely in ICU patients with elevated body mass index, those with a personal or family history of venous thromboembolism, and those receiving vasopressors. Alternate management or incremental risk reduction strategies may be needed in such patients. (Crit Care Med 2015; 43:401-410).

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)401-410
Número de páginas10
PublicaciónCritical Care Medicine
Volumen43
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublished - feb. 1 2015
Publicado de forma externa

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Failure of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis: Risk factors in medical-surgical critically Ill patients'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto