TY - JOUR
T1 - Good days and bad days in dementia
T2 - A qualitative chart review of variable symptom expression
AU - Rockwood, Kenneth
AU - Fay, Sherri
AU - Hamilton, Laura
AU - Ross, Elyse
AU - Moorhouse, Paige
PY - 2014/8
Y1 - 2014/8
N2 - Background: Despite its importance in the lived experience of dementia, symptom fluctuation has been little studied outside Lewy body dementia. We aimed to characterize symptom fluctuation in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mixed dementia. Methods: A qualitative analysis of health records that included notations on good days and bad days yielded 52 community-dwelling patients (women, n = 30; aged 39-91 years; mild dementia, n = 26, chiefly AD, n = 36). Results: Good days/bad days were most often described as changes in the same core set of symptoms (e.g. less/more verbal repetition). In other cases, only good or only bad days were described (e.g. no bad days, better sense of humor on good days). Good days were typically associated with improved global cognition, function, interest, and initiation. Bad days were associated with frequent verbal repetition, poor memory, increased agitation and other disruptive behaviors. Conclusions: Clinically important variability in symptoms appears common in AD and mixed dementia. Even so, what makes a day good is not simply more (or less) of what makes a day bad. Further investigation of the factors that facilitate or encourage good days and mitigate bad days may help improve quality of life for patients and caregivers.
AB - Background: Despite its importance in the lived experience of dementia, symptom fluctuation has been little studied outside Lewy body dementia. We aimed to characterize symptom fluctuation in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mixed dementia. Methods: A qualitative analysis of health records that included notations on good days and bad days yielded 52 community-dwelling patients (women, n = 30; aged 39-91 years; mild dementia, n = 26, chiefly AD, n = 36). Results: Good days/bad days were most often described as changes in the same core set of symptoms (e.g. less/more verbal repetition). In other cases, only good or only bad days were described (e.g. no bad days, better sense of humor on good days). Good days were typically associated with improved global cognition, function, interest, and initiation. Bad days were associated with frequent verbal repetition, poor memory, increased agitation and other disruptive behaviors. Conclusions: Clinically important variability in symptoms appears common in AD and mixed dementia. Even so, what makes a day good is not simply more (or less) of what makes a day bad. Further investigation of the factors that facilitate or encourage good days and mitigate bad days may help improve quality of life for patients and caregivers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903608389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903608389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1041610214000222
DO - 10.1017/S1041610214000222
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24565377
AN - SCOPUS:84903608389
SN - 1041-6102
VL - 26
SP - 1239
EP - 1246
JO - International Psychogeriatrics
JF - International Psychogeriatrics
IS - 8
ER -