Harvesting Airway Surface Liquid: A Comparison of Two Techniques

Jennifer S. Landry, Champlain Landry, Elizabeth A. Cowley, Karuthapillai Govindaraju, David H. Eidelman

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

4 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The quantity and composition of airway surface liquid (ASL) are essential to host defense. To date, attempts to harvest ASL and measure its composition have yielded conflicting results. We investigated the physical principles underlying two techniques that were proposed for harvesting ASL: filter paper pledgets and polyethylene catheters. We compared the force and pressure generation and the kinematics of capillarity-induced fluid uptake with both techniques. Both have significant limitations for harvesting ASL, generating physiologically significant pressures (filter paper, 60.4 Pa; polyethylene, 14. 3 Pa) that could potentially compromise epithelial integrity. Furthermore, filter paper generates a force 85-fold higher than the polyethylene catheter, which is associated with a very high rate of uptake of liquid and a large total amount of liquid relative to ASL thickness. While the PE catheter harvests liquid more gently, it is only effective when ASL surface tension is below 31 mN/m. These limitations likely account for some of the variability in reported ASL composition, and highlight the need for improved methods for harvesting ASL.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)149-157
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónPediatric Pulmonology
Volumen37
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublished - feb. 2004

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Harvesting Airway Surface Liquid: A Comparison of Two Techniques'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto