Impact of Detection Method and Age on Survival Outcomes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Analysis

Daniel Rayson, Jennifer I. Payne, James C.R. Michael, Kaitlyn M. Tsuruda, Mohamed Abdolell, Penny J. Barnes

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

7 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Population-based information on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is limited. We describe 412 patients with TNBC diagnosed between 2005 and 2012 within a population-based comprehensive breast screening program. Younger patients experienced shorter times to disease recurrence and death compared to older patients. Screen-detected cases had better survival than others, suggesting that new screening strategies for TNBC may improve outcomes. Background: Most investigations have compared triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to non-TNBC to elucidate clinical or epidemiologic differences between subtypes. We examined a contemporary cohort of patients with primary TNBC by detection and age at diagnosis within a population-based breast screening program to examine survival outcomes. Patients and Methods: All women with a diagnosis of primary TNBC between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2012, in Nova Scotia, Canada, were included. Clinicopathologic and detection variables were abstracted from the Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program. Patient charts were abstracted for adjuvant therapies and survival outcomes, supplemented by provincial vital statistical data. Results: A total of 412 patients comprised the study population, with almost half aged over 60 years (46.3%) and 30.2% having screen-detected disease. There were no significant differences in prognostic variables between age groups. Younger patients were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (96.3% ≤ 49 years vs. 31.2% ≥ 70 years), but there were no differences in disease-free or breast cancer–specific survival between the age groups. For those with disease recurrence, median time to recurrence and death was shorter for younger patients (17 vs. 26 months, 16 vs. 33 months respectively; age 40-49 vs. 70+). Those with screen-detected disease had better disease-free, breast cancer–specific, and overall survival outcomes. Conclusion: Detection method may play a role in TNBC survival outcomes, thus supporting novel screening strategies for TNBC. Shorter time to survival events in the younger patient groups suggests that TNBC is a clinically heterogeneous disease despite similarities in prognostic factors across age.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)e955-e960
PublicaciónClinical Breast Cancer
Volumen18
N.º5
DOI
EstadoPublished - oct. 2018

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Impact of Detection Method and Age on Survival Outcomes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Analysis'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto