TY - JOUR
T1 - Influenza pandemic planning and performance in Canada, 2009
AU - Kendal, Alan P.
AU - MacDonald, Noni E.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - This commentary evaluates Canadian actions following identification of pH1N1 influenza virus in 2009. We also report on some international issues affecting vaccine manufacture, and compare pH1N1 influenza vaccination programs in several industrialized countries. WHO's pandemic declaration was the trigger for Canada to take the following steps: 1) implement its sole source pandemic vaccine supply contract, 2) use an alternate, internationally-developed approach to authorize emergency use of adjuvant-containing vaccine not yet fully approved in Canada, 3) release stocks of antiviral, and 4) develop many health-related policies, through committees other than those normally used outside a pandemic. We note key successes and challenges in these steps, and suggest responses to two priority issues: first, improve planning for surges in demand for the clinical services that represent the main way in which severe disease impact was reduced, and second, establish from the outset of Public Health planning that immunization programs will phase use of vaccine in different target groups, as done elsewhere, reflecting realistic vaccine delivery rates and the likely early occurrence of the main epidemic wave.
AB - This commentary evaluates Canadian actions following identification of pH1N1 influenza virus in 2009. We also report on some international issues affecting vaccine manufacture, and compare pH1N1 influenza vaccination programs in several industrialized countries. WHO's pandemic declaration was the trigger for Canada to take the following steps: 1) implement its sole source pandemic vaccine supply contract, 2) use an alternate, internationally-developed approach to authorize emergency use of adjuvant-containing vaccine not yet fully approved in Canada, 3) release stocks of antiviral, and 4) develop many health-related policies, through committees other than those normally used outside a pandemic. We note key successes and challenges in these steps, and suggest responses to two priority issues: first, improve planning for surges in demand for the clinical services that represent the main way in which severe disease impact was reduced, and second, establish from the outset of Public Health planning that immunization programs will phase use of vaccine in different target groups, as done elsewhere, reflecting realistic vaccine delivery rates and the likely early occurrence of the main epidemic wave.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651301373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651301373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/bf03403962
DO - 10.1007/bf03403962
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:78651301373
SN - 0008-4263
VL - 101
SP - 447
EP - 453
JO - Canadian Journal of Public Health
JF - Canadian Journal of Public Health
IS - 6
ER -