TY - JOUR
T1 - Interventions to improve care coordination between primary healthcare and oncology care providers
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Tomasone, Jennifer R.
AU - Brouwers, Melissa C.
AU - Vukmirovic, Marija
AU - Grunfeld, Eva
AU - O'Brien, Mary Ann
AU - Urquhart, Robin
AU - Walker, Melanie
AU - Webster, Fiona
AU - Fitch, Margaret
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding The CanIMPACT project is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (reference number: 128272).
Publisher Copyright:
© Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited.
PY - 2016/10
Y1 - 2016/10
N2 - Coordination of patient care between primary care and oncology care providers is vital to care quality and outcomes across the cancer continuum, yet it is known to be challenging. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate current or new models of care and/or interventions aimed at improving coordination between primary care and oncology care providers for patients with adult breast and/or colorectal cancer. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination were searched for existing English language studies published between January 2000 and 15 May 2015. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies were included if they evaluated a specific model/intervention that was designed to improve care coordination between primary care and oncology care providers, for any stage of the cancer continuum, for patients with adult breast and/or colorectal cancer. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Twenty-two studies (5 systematic reviews, 6 RCTs and 11 non-randomised studies) were included and varied with respect to the targeted phase of the cancer continuum, type of model or intervention tested, and outcome measures. The majority of studies showed no statistically significant changes in any patient, provider or system outcomes. Owing to conceptual and methodological limitations in this field, the review is unable to provide specific conclusions about the most effective or preferred model/intervention to improve care coordination. Imprecise results that lack generalisability and definitiveness provide limited evidence to base the development of future interventions and policies. Trial registration number CRD42015025006.
AB - Coordination of patient care between primary care and oncology care providers is vital to care quality and outcomes across the cancer continuum, yet it is known to be challenging. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate current or new models of care and/or interventions aimed at improving coordination between primary care and oncology care providers for patients with adult breast and/or colorectal cancer. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination were searched for existing English language studies published between January 2000 and 15 May 2015. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies were included if they evaluated a specific model/intervention that was designed to improve care coordination between primary care and oncology care providers, for any stage of the cancer continuum, for patients with adult breast and/or colorectal cancer. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Twenty-two studies (5 systematic reviews, 6 RCTs and 11 non-randomised studies) were included and varied with respect to the targeted phase of the cancer continuum, type of model or intervention tested, and outcome measures. The majority of studies showed no statistically significant changes in any patient, provider or system outcomes. Owing to conceptual and methodological limitations in this field, the review is unable to provide specific conclusions about the most effective or preferred model/intervention to improve care coordination. Imprecise results that lack generalisability and definitiveness provide limited evidence to base the development of future interventions and policies. Trial registration number CRD42015025006.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033793372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033793372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000077
DO - 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000077
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27843639
AN - SCOPUS:85033793372
SN - 2059-7029
VL - 1
JO - ESMO Open
JF - ESMO Open
IS - 5
M1 - e000077
ER -