TY - JOUR
T1 - Les bisphosphonates dans le traitement de l'ostéoporose
T2 - Bienfaits attendus, torts potentiels et congés thérapeutiques
AU - Brown, Jacques P.
AU - Morin, Suzanne
AU - Leslie, Msc William
AU - Papaioannou, Alexandra
AU - Cheung, Angela M.
AU - Davison, Kenneth S.
AU - Goltzman, David
AU - Hanley, David Arthur
AU - Hodsman, Anthony
AU - Josse, Robert
AU - Jovaisas, Algis
AU - Juby, Angela
AU - Kaiser, Stephanie
AU - Karaplis, Andrew
AU - Kendler, David
AU - Khan, Aliya
AU - Ngui, Daniel
AU - Olszynski, Wojciech
AU - Ste-Marie, Louis Georges
AU - Adachi, Jonathan
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Objective: To outline the efficacy and risks of bisphosphonate therapy for the management of osteoporosis and describe which patients might be eligible for bisphosphonate "drug holiday." Quality of evidence: MEDLINE (PubMed, through December 31, 2012) was used to identify relevant publications for inclusion. Most of the evidence cited is level II evidence (non-randomized, cohort, and other comparisons trials). Main message: The antifracture efficacy of approved first-line bisphosphonates has been proven in randomized controlled clinical trials. However, with more extensive and prolonged clinical use of bisphosphonates, associations have been reported between their administration and the occurrence of rare, but serious, adverse events. Osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur fractures might be related to the use of bisphosphonates in osteoporosis, but they are exceedingly rare and they often occur with other comorbidities or concomitant medication use. Drug holidays should only be considered in low-risk patients and in select patients at moderate risk of fracture after 3 to 5 years of therapy. Conclusion: When bisphosphonates are prescribed to patients at high risk of fracture, their antifracture benefits considerably outweigh their potential for harm. For patients taking bisphosphonates for 3 to 5 years, reassess the need for ongoing therapy.
AB - Objective: To outline the efficacy and risks of bisphosphonate therapy for the management of osteoporosis and describe which patients might be eligible for bisphosphonate "drug holiday." Quality of evidence: MEDLINE (PubMed, through December 31, 2012) was used to identify relevant publications for inclusion. Most of the evidence cited is level II evidence (non-randomized, cohort, and other comparisons trials). Main message: The antifracture efficacy of approved first-line bisphosphonates has been proven in randomized controlled clinical trials. However, with more extensive and prolonged clinical use of bisphosphonates, associations have been reported between their administration and the occurrence of rare, but serious, adverse events. Osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur fractures might be related to the use of bisphosphonates in osteoporosis, but they are exceedingly rare and they often occur with other comorbidities or concomitant medication use. Drug holidays should only be considered in low-risk patients and in select patients at moderate risk of fracture after 3 to 5 years of therapy. Conclusion: When bisphosphonates are prescribed to patients at high risk of fracture, their antifracture benefits considerably outweigh their potential for harm. For patients taking bisphosphonates for 3 to 5 years, reassess the need for ongoing therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904406444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904406444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - L'article
C2 - 24733321
AN - SCOPUS:84904406444
SN - 0008-350X
VL - 60
SP - 324-333+e197+e207
JO - Canadian Family Physician
JF - Canadian Family Physician
IS - 4
ER -