Luck, come here! Automatic approach tendencies toward gambling cues in moderate- to high-risk gamblers

Marilisa Boffo, Ruby Smits, Joshua P. Salmon, Megan E. Cowie, David T.H.A. de Jong, Elske Salemink, Pam Collins, Sherry H. Stewart, Reinout W. Wiers

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

30 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background and aims: Similar to substance addictions, reward-related cognitive motivational processes, such as selective attention and positive memory biases, have been found in disordered gambling. Despite findings that individuals with substance use problems are biased to approach substance-related cues automatically, no study has yet focused on automatic approach tendencies for motivationally salient gambling cues in problem gamblers. We tested if moderate- to high-risk gamblers show a gambling approach bias and whether this bias was related prospectively to gambling behaviour and problems. Design: Cross-sectional assessment study evaluating the concurrent and longitudinal correlates of gambling approach bias in moderate- to high-risk gamblers compared with non-problem gamblers. Setting: Online study throughout the Netherlands. Participants: Twenty-six non-treatment-seeking moderate- to high-risk gamblers and 26 non-problem gamblers community-recruited via the internet. Measurements: Two online assessment sessions 6 months apart, including self-report measures of gambling problems and behaviour (frequency, duration and expenditure) and the gambling approach avoidance task, with stimuli tailored to individual gambling habits. Findings: Relative to non-problem gamblers, moderate- to high-risk gamblers revealed a stronger approach bias towards gambling-related stimuli than neutral stimuli (P = 0.03). Gambling approach bias was correlated positively with past-month gambling expenditure at baseline (P = 0.03) and with monthly frequency of gambling at follow-up (P = 0.02). In multiple hierarchical regressions, baseline gambling approach bias predicted monthly frequency positively (P = 0.03) and total duration of gambling episodes (P = 0.01) 6 months later, but not gambling problems or expenditure. Conclusions: In the Netherlands, relative to non-problem gamblers, moderate- to high-risk gamblers appear to have a stronger tendency to approach rather than to avoid gambling-related pictures compared with neutral ones. This gambling approach bias is associated concurrently with past-month gambling expenditure and duration of gambling and has been found to predict persistence in gambling behaviour over time.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)289-298
Número de páginas10
PublicaciónAddiction
Volumen113
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublished - feb. 1 2018

Nota bibliográfica

Funding Information:
Research funded through the National Center for Responsible Gaming is provided by an array of different sources, one of which is the gambling industry. Thus, while the gambling industry has funded this research indirectly through contributions to our funder, the NCRG, they had no role in the conduct of this study, the interpretation of findings or the decision to publish.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Society for the Study of Addiction.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Luck, come here! Automatic approach tendencies toward gambling cues in moderate- to high-risk gamblers'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto