Medical Residents and Interprofessional Interactions in Discharge: An Ethnographic Exploration of Factors That Affect Negotiation

Joanne Goldman, Scott Reeves, Robert Wu, Ivan Silver, Kathleen MacMillan, Simon Kitto

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

20 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background: Interprofessional collaboration is an important aspect of patient discharge from a general internal medicine (GIM) unit. However, there has been minimal empirical or theoretical research that has examined interactions that occur between medical residents and other healthcare professionals in the discharge process. This study provides insight into the social processes that shape and characterize such interactions. Objective: To explore factors that shape interactions between medical residents and other healthcare professionals in relation to patient discharge, and to examine the opportunities for negotiations about discharge between these professional groups. Design: A qualitative ethnographic approach using observations, interviews and documentary analysis. Participants and setting: Healthcare professionals working in a GIM unit in Canada. Approach: Sixty-five hours of observations were undertaken in a range of settings (e.g. interprofessional rounds, medical and nursing rounds, nursing station) in the unit over a 17-month period. A maximum variation sampling approach was used to identify healthcare professionals working in the unit. Twenty-three interviews were completed, recorded and transcribed verbatim. A directed content approach using theories of medical dominance and negotiated order was used to analyze the data. Key results: The organization of clinical work in combination with clinical teaching influenced interprofessional interactions and the quality of discharge in this GIM unit. While organizational activities (orientation and rounds) and individual activities (e.g. role modeling, teaching) supported negotiations between medical residents and other healthcare professionals around discharge, participants had varied perspectives about their effectiveness. Conclusions: This study illuminates social factors and processes that require attention in order to address challenges with interprofessional collaboration and discharge in GIM. These findings have implications for medical education, workplace learning, patient safety and quality improvement.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)1454-1460
Número de páginas7
PublicaciónJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volumen30
N.º10
DOI
EstadoPublished - oct. 29 2015

Nota bibliográfica

Funding Information:
This research was conducted as part of Joanne Goldman’s doctoral dissertation, which was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Joanne was the recipient of a Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship Doctoral Award. We would like to thank the GIM staff that participated in the interviews and observations in this research.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Society of General Internal Medicine.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Internal Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Medical Residents and Interprofessional Interactions in Discharge: An Ethnographic Exploration of Factors That Affect Negotiation'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto