TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient compliance with a group model of care
T2 - The hernia clinic
AU - Van Den Heuvel, Baukje
AU - Vair, Brock
AU - Porter, Geoff
AU - Klassen, Dennis
AU - Inglis, Karen
AU - Bonjer, H. Jaap
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - Background: In February 2006, a hernia clinic was established at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. It was based on a group model of care and was established to increase effective use of resources to reduce waiting times. We conducted a survey of patients referred to the hernia clinic to determine compliance. Methods: We developed and mailed a questionnaire to all patients who had surgery after assessment at the hernia clinic. Data were analyzed for the entire study group and for 2 subgroups: patients in group I had the same surgeon for assessment and surgery, whereas patients in group II had a different surgeon for assessment and surgery. Differences between subgroups were assessed using the 2-tailed Fisher exact test. Waiting times were recorded. Results: In all, 94 patients responded to the survey. Of these, 67% had the same surgeon for assessment and surgery, and 31% had a different surgeon; 2% were not sure. Two-thirds were comfortable having their surgery performed by a surgeon whom they met the day of surgery. Most patients had confidence in the competence of any surgeon and considered service to be better and faster in a specialized centre. Most felt that a group of surgeons providing hernia care uses resources more effectively. The waiting times from referral to initial consult decreased from 208 (standard deviation [SD] 139) days in 2007 to 59 (SD 70) days in 2009. Conclusion: Patient compliance with a group model of care for hernia surgery is high.
AB - Background: In February 2006, a hernia clinic was established at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. It was based on a group model of care and was established to increase effective use of resources to reduce waiting times. We conducted a survey of patients referred to the hernia clinic to determine compliance. Methods: We developed and mailed a questionnaire to all patients who had surgery after assessment at the hernia clinic. Data were analyzed for the entire study group and for 2 subgroups: patients in group I had the same surgeon for assessment and surgery, whereas patients in group II had a different surgeon for assessment and surgery. Differences between subgroups were assessed using the 2-tailed Fisher exact test. Waiting times were recorded. Results: In all, 94 patients responded to the survey. Of these, 67% had the same surgeon for assessment and surgery, and 31% had a different surgeon; 2% were not sure. Two-thirds were comfortable having their surgery performed by a surgeon whom they met the day of surgery. Most patients had confidence in the competence of any surgeon and considered service to be better and faster in a specialized centre. Most felt that a group of surgeons providing hernia care uses resources more effectively. The waiting times from referral to initial consult decreased from 208 (standard deviation [SD] 139) days in 2007 to 59 (SD 70) days in 2009. Conclusion: Patient compliance with a group model of care for hernia surgery is high.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865252454&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865252454&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1503/cjs.002811
DO - 10.1503/cjs.002811
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22617535
AN - SCOPUS:84865252454
SN - 0008-428X
VL - 55
SP - 259
EP - 263
JO - Canadian Journal of Surgery
JF - Canadian Journal of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -