TY - JOUR
T1 - Physician-assisted death
AU - Abrahao, Agessandro
AU - Downar, James
AU - Pinto, Hanika
AU - Dupré, Nicolas
AU - Izenberg, Aaron
AU - Kingston, William
AU - Korngut, Lawrence
AU - O'Connell, Colleen
AU - Petrescu, Nicolae
AU - Shoesmith, Christen
AU - Tandon, Anu
AU - Vargas-Santos, Ana Beatriz
AU - Zinman, Lorne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2016/9/13
Y1 - 2016/9/13
N2 - Objective: To survey amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) health care providers to determine attitudes regarding physician-assisted death (PAD) after the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) invalidated the Criminal Code provisions that prohibit PAD in February 2015. Methods: We conducted a Canada-wide survey of physicians and allied health professionals (AHP) involved in the care of patients with ALS on their opinions regarding (1) the SCC ruling, (2) their willingness to participate in PAD, and (3) the PAD implementation process for patients with ALS. Results: We received 231 responses from ALS health care providers representing all 15 academic ALS centers in Canada, with an overall response rate for invited participants of 74%. The majority of physicians and AHP agreed with the SCC ruling and believed that patients with moderate and severe stage ALS should have access to PAD; however, most physicians would not provide a lethal prescription or injection to an eligible patient. They preferred the patient obtain a second opinion to confirm eligibility, have a psychiatric assessment, and then be referred to a third party to administer PAD. The majority of respondents felt unprepared for the initiation of this program and favored the development of PAD training modules and guidelines. Conclusions: ALS health care providers support the SCC decision and the majority believe PAD should be available to patients with moderate to severe ALS with physical or emotional suffering. However, few clinicians are willing to directly provide PAD and additional training and guidelines are required before implementation in Canada.
AB - Objective: To survey amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) health care providers to determine attitudes regarding physician-assisted death (PAD) after the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) invalidated the Criminal Code provisions that prohibit PAD in February 2015. Methods: We conducted a Canada-wide survey of physicians and allied health professionals (AHP) involved in the care of patients with ALS on their opinions regarding (1) the SCC ruling, (2) their willingness to participate in PAD, and (3) the PAD implementation process for patients with ALS. Results: We received 231 responses from ALS health care providers representing all 15 academic ALS centers in Canada, with an overall response rate for invited participants of 74%. The majority of physicians and AHP agreed with the SCC ruling and believed that patients with moderate and severe stage ALS should have access to PAD; however, most physicians would not provide a lethal prescription or injection to an eligible patient. They preferred the patient obtain a second opinion to confirm eligibility, have a psychiatric assessment, and then be referred to a third party to administer PAD. The majority of respondents felt unprepared for the initiation of this program and favored the development of PAD training modules and guidelines. Conclusions: ALS health care providers support the SCC decision and the majority believe PAD should be available to patients with moderate to severe ALS with physical or emotional suffering. However, few clinicians are willing to directly provide PAD and additional training and guidelines are required before implementation in Canada.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987653550&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987653550&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002786
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002786
M3 - Article
C2 - 27178703
AN - SCOPUS:84987653550
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 87
SP - 1152
EP - 1160
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 11
ER -