TY - JOUR
T1 - Practice patterns and perceptions of margin status for breast conserving surgery for breast carcinoma
T2 - National Survey of Canadian General Surgeons
AU - Lovrics, Peter J.
AU - Gordon, Maggie
AU - Cornacchi, Sylvie D.
AU - Farrokhyar, Forough
AU - Ramsaroop, Amanda
AU - Hodgson, Nicole
AU - Quan, May Lynn
AU - Wright, Francis
AU - Porter, Geoffrey
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was funded by a Knowledge Translation/Linkage grant from the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (CBCRA). The granting agency did not have a role in the study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Background: We surveyed Canadian General Surgeons to examine decision-making in early stage breast cancer. Methods: A modified Dillman Method was used for this mail survey of 1443 surgeons. Practice patterns and factors that influence management choices for: preoperative assessment, definition of margin status, surgical techniques and recommendations for re-excision were assessed. Results: The response rate was 51% with 41% treating breast cancer. Most (80%) were community surgeons, with equal distribution of low/medium/high volume and years of practice categories. Approximately 25% of surgeons "sometimes or frequently" performed diagnostic excisional biopsies while 90% report "frequently" or "always" performing preoperative core biopsies. There was marked variation in defining negative and close margins, in the use of intra-operative margin assessment techniques and recommendations for re-excision. Conclusions: Responses revealed significant variation in attitudes and practices. These findings likely reflect an absence of consensus in the literature and potential gaps between best evidence and practice.
AB - Background: We surveyed Canadian General Surgeons to examine decision-making in early stage breast cancer. Methods: A modified Dillman Method was used for this mail survey of 1443 surgeons. Practice patterns and factors that influence management choices for: preoperative assessment, definition of margin status, surgical techniques and recommendations for re-excision were assessed. Results: The response rate was 51% with 41% treating breast cancer. Most (80%) were community surgeons, with equal distribution of low/medium/high volume and years of practice categories. Approximately 25% of surgeons "sometimes or frequently" performed diagnostic excisional biopsies while 90% report "frequently" or "always" performing preoperative core biopsies. There was marked variation in defining negative and close margins, in the use of intra-operative margin assessment techniques and recommendations for re-excision. Conclusions: Responses revealed significant variation in attitudes and practices. These findings likely reflect an absence of consensus in the literature and potential gaps between best evidence and practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869206704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869206704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.breast.2012.07.017
DO - 10.1016/j.breast.2012.07.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 22901975
AN - SCOPUS:84869206704
SN - 0960-9776
VL - 21
SP - 730
EP - 734
JO - Breast
JF - Breast
IS - 6
ER -