Publikační bias: Lze se spolehnout na metaanalýzy?

Tomáš Hájek

Publikační bias: Lze se spolehnout na metaanalýzy?

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Encuesta corta › revisión exhaustiva

Resumen

Publication bias, e.g. greater likelihood that studies with positive results will be published can breach the quality of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. The paper briefly reviews published evidence providing answers to following questions: Does publication bias exist? Is publication bias mainly caused by investigators or editors? Are negative results published more slowly than positive ones?

Título traducido de la contribución	Publication bias: Are meta-analyses reliable?
Idioma original	Czech
Páginas (desde-hasta)	252-254
Número de páginas	3
Publicación	Psychiatrie
Volumen	6
N.º	4
Estado	Published - 2002
Publicado de forma externa	Sí

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

Psychiatry and Mental health

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

@article{6ea0e6dd339345048845b4a8dcf10f85,

title = "Publika{\v c}n{\'i} bias: Lze se spolehnout na metaanal{\'y}zy?",

abstract = "Publication bias, e.g. greater likelihood that studies with positive results will be published can breach the quality of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. The paper briefly reviews published evidence providing answers to following questions: Does publication bias exist? Is publication bias mainly caused by investigators or editors? Are negative results published more slowly than positive ones?",

author = "Tom{\'a}{\v s} H{\'a}jek",

year = "2002",

language = "Tch{\`e}que",

volume = "6",

pages = "252--254",

journal = "Psychiatrie",

issn = "1211-7579",

publisher = "TIGIS Spol. s.r.o.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Publikační bias

T2 - Lze se spolehnout na metaanalýzy?

AU - Hájek, Tomáš

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Publication bias, e.g. greater likelihood that studies with positive results will be published can breach the quality of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. The paper briefly reviews published evidence providing answers to following questions: Does publication bias exist? Is publication bias mainly caused by investigators or editors? Are negative results published more slowly than positive ones?

AB - Publication bias, e.g. greater likelihood that studies with positive results will be published can breach the quality of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. The paper briefly reviews published evidence providing answers to following questions: Does publication bias exist? Is publication bias mainly caused by investigators or editors? Are negative results published more slowly than positive ones?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036459299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036459299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Encuesta corta

AN - SCOPUS:0036459299

SN - 1211-7579

VL - 6

SP - 252

EP - 254

JO - Psychiatrie

JF - Psychiatrie

IS - 4

ER -

Publikační bias: Lze se spolehnout na metaanalýzy?

Resumen

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto