TY - CHAP
T1 - Searching in space and in time
AU - Klein, Raymond M.
AU - Ishigami, Yoko
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Our conception of attention is intricately linked to limited processing capacity and the consequent requirement to select, in both space and time, what objects and actions will have access to these limited resources. Seminal studies by Treisman(Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136, 1980) and Broadbent (Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 105-113, 1987; Raymond et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860, 1992) offered the field tasks for exploring the properties of attention when searching in space and time. After describing the natural history of a search episode we briefly review some of these properties. We end with the question: Is there one attentional "beam" that operates in both space and time to integrate features into objects? We sought an answer by exploring the distribution of errors when the same participant searched for targets presented at the same location with items distributed over time (McLean et al. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 171-186, 1982) and presented all at once with items distributed over space (Snyder Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 428-431, 1972). Preliminary results revealed a null correlation between spatial and temporal slippage suggesting separate selection mechanisms in these two domains.
AB - Our conception of attention is intricately linked to limited processing capacity and the consequent requirement to select, in both space and time, what objects and actions will have access to these limited resources. Seminal studies by Treisman(Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136, 1980) and Broadbent (Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 105-113, 1987; Raymond et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860, 1992) offered the field tasks for exploring the properties of attention when searching in space and time. After describing the natural history of a search episode we briefly review some of these properties. We end with the question: Is there one attentional "beam" that operates in both space and time to integrate features into objects? We sought an answer by exploring the distribution of errors when the same participant searched for targets presented at the same location with items distributed over time (McLean et al. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 171-186, 1982) and presented all at once with items distributed over space (Snyder Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 428-431, 1972). Preliminary results revealed a null correlation between spatial and temporal slippage suggesting separate selection mechanisms in these two domains.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873595730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873595730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4614-4794-8_2
DO - 10.1007/978-1-4614-4794-8_2
M3 - Chapter
C2 - 23437628
AN - SCOPUS:84873595730
SN - 9781461447931
T3 - Nebraska Symposium on Motivation
SP - 5
EP - 22
BT - The Influence of Attention, Learning, and Motivation on Visual Search
PB - Springer Science and Business Media, LLC
ER -