TY - JOUR
T1 - The Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading scale for angina pectoris
T2 - Is it time for refinements?
AU - Cox, J.
AU - Naylor, C. D.
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - Objective: To appraise the measurement properties of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification of stable angina pectoris. Data Sources: Relevant articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (1976 to November 1991). Bibliographies of retrieved articles were also reviewed. Study Selection: Studies chosen directly addressed the validity and reliability of the CCS scale. Recent studies and reviews of related topics (for example, silent ischemia) are selectively cited. Data Synthesis: No data address the scale's applicability, that is, how clinicians typically assign angina grades in practice. Comprehensiveness would be improved by coverage of the patient's perceptions of symptom burden; mixed exertional and rest symptoms; episodic or changing symptoms; and modifying factors. Reliability was assessed in one study with two clinicians; the interobserver, chance- corrected agreement on patient grading was 60%. Content validity (the ability of the scale to measure what it claims) is threatened by the unproven assumption of symptomatic or physiologic equivalence among diverse levels of different activities within any given grade of angina. Construct validity is uncertain, given weak relations between angina grade and noninvasive markers of ischemia, anatomical disease, or prognosis. The scale's responsiveness (the ability to detect the smallest clinically important changes) is limited by the reliance on four coarse gradations based on only ambulation or stair- climbing. Conclusions: The CCS scale for stable angina might be made more useful by developing measurements for patients' self-rated symptom burden and the changes they deem important; by adding items on clinical instability (that is, progressive symptoms or pain at rest); and by empirically testing the current scale to eliminate redundant or inconsistent elements.
AB - Objective: To appraise the measurement properties of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification of stable angina pectoris. Data Sources: Relevant articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (1976 to November 1991). Bibliographies of retrieved articles were also reviewed. Study Selection: Studies chosen directly addressed the validity and reliability of the CCS scale. Recent studies and reviews of related topics (for example, silent ischemia) are selectively cited. Data Synthesis: No data address the scale's applicability, that is, how clinicians typically assign angina grades in practice. Comprehensiveness would be improved by coverage of the patient's perceptions of symptom burden; mixed exertional and rest symptoms; episodic or changing symptoms; and modifying factors. Reliability was assessed in one study with two clinicians; the interobserver, chance- corrected agreement on patient grading was 60%. Content validity (the ability of the scale to measure what it claims) is threatened by the unproven assumption of symptomatic or physiologic equivalence among diverse levels of different activities within any given grade of angina. Construct validity is uncertain, given weak relations between angina grade and noninvasive markers of ischemia, anatomical disease, or prognosis. The scale's responsiveness (the ability to detect the smallest clinically important changes) is limited by the reliance on four coarse gradations based on only ambulation or stair- climbing. Conclusions: The CCS scale for stable angina might be made more useful by developing measurements for patients' self-rated symptom burden and the changes they deem important; by adding items on clinical instability (that is, progressive symptoms or pain at rest); and by empirically testing the current scale to eliminate redundant or inconsistent elements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026746133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026746133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7326/0003-4819-117-8-677
DO - 10.7326/0003-4819-117-8-677
M3 - Article
C2 - 1530200
AN - SCOPUS:0026746133
SN - 0003-4819
VL - 117
SP - 677
EP - 683
JO - Annals of Internal Medicine
JF - Annals of Internal Medicine
IS - 8
ER -