Resumen
Background: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been reported to reduce tobacco craving and withdrawal; however, the mechanisms underlying these effects have not been elucidated. Methods: This study examined the contributions of nicotine stimulus and response expectancies to responses to nicotine-free e-cigarettes in 21 e-cigarette naïve smokers (12 male). Participants completed two randomized experimental sessions in which they administered a nicotine-free e-cigarette. During one session they were informed that the e-cigarette contained nicotine and during the other session they were informed that the e-cigarette was nicotine-free. Participants completed subjective assessments before and immediately after sampling ten puffs from the e-cigarette and were then invited to earn additional puffs using a computerized progressive ratio task. Prior to their enrolment in the study, participants provided an estimate of the relative importance of the nicotine content of e-cigarettes for craving relief. Results: Instructions that the e-cigarette contained nicotine were found to reduce both intention to smoke (p. =. 0.017) and withdrawal-related (p. =. 0.018) craving, regardless of a-priori reported beliefs regarding the relative importance of nicotine. Nicotine content instructions were also found to be associated with a shorter latency to self-administration (p. =. 0.005); however, a Sex. ×. Instructions. ×. Response Expectancy interaction (p. =. 0.008) revealed that this effect was specific to women who had strong a-priori nicotine content craving relief expectations. Neither nicotine content instructions nor response expectancies impacted the number of puffs self-administered. Conclusions: Findings suggest that nicotine content expectations contribute to smokers' responses to e-cigarettes, and that a-priori beliefs about nicotine effects may be especially important in women.
Idioma original | English |
---|---|
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 144-147 |
Número de páginas | 4 |
Publicación | Addictive Behaviors |
Volumen | 40 |
DOI | |
Estado | Published - ene. 1 2015 |
Nota bibliográfica
Funding Information:Funding for this study was provided by grant to Sean Barrett from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada ( NSERC ) and NSERC had no further role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Medicine (miscellaneous)
- Clinical Psychology
- Toxicology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't