Resumen
Purpose: To assess the validity of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) of patient activation in persons with neurological conditions. Methods: “The Everyday Experience of Living with and Managing a Neurological Condition” (The LINC study) surveyed 948 adults with neurological conditions residing in Canada in 2011 and 2012. Using data for 722 respondents who met coding requirements for the PAM-13, we examined the properties of the measure using principle components analysis, inter-item correlations and Cronbach’s alpha to assess unidimensionality and internal consistency. Rasch modeling was used to assess item performance and scaling. Construct validity was assessed by calculating associations between the PAM and known correlates. Results: PAM-13 provides a suitably reliable and valid instrument for research in patients with neurological conditions, but scaling problems may yield measurement error and biases for those with low levels of activation. This is of particular importance when used in clinical settings or for individual client care. Our study also suggests that measurement of activation may benefit from tailoring items and scaling to specific diagnostic groups such as people with neurological conditions, thus allowing the PAM-13 to recognize unique attributes and management challenges in those conditions. Conclusions: The PAM-13 is an internally reliable and valid tool for research purposes. The use of categorical activation “level” in clinical settings should be done with caution.
Idioma original | English |
---|---|
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 1587-1596 |
Número de páginas | 10 |
Publicación | Quality of Life Research |
Volumen | 24 |
N.º | 7 |
DOI | |
Estado | Published - jul. 30 2015 |
Nota bibliográfica
Funding Information:This study was part of the National Population Health Study of Neurological Conditions. We wish to acknowledge the membership of Neurological Health Charities Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada for their contribution to the success of this initiative. Funding for the study was provided by the Public Health Agency of Canada. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors/researchers and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Public Health Agency of Canada. The authors wish to thank the many participants in the LINC study as well as the large research team who made the study possible.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't