Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: Testing the methodology

Eva Grunfeld, Lynn Lethbridge, Ron Dewar, Beverley Lawson, Lawrence F. Paszat, Grace Johnston, Frederick Burge, Paul McIntyre, Craig C. Earle

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

123 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This study is concerned with methods to measure population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care. Using a retrospective cohort approach, we assessed the feasibility, validity and reliability of using administrative databases to measure quality indicators of end-of-life care in two Canadian provinces. The study sample consisted of all females who died of breast cancer between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2002, in Nova Scotia or Ontario, Canada. From an initial list of 19 quality indicators selected from the literature, seven were determined to be fully measurable in both provinces. An additional seven indicators in one province and three in the other province were partially measurable. Tests comparing administrative and chart data show a high level of agreement with inter-rater reliability, confirming consistency in the chart abstraction process. Using administrative data is an efficient, population-based method to monitor quality of care which can compliment other methods, such as qualitative and purposefully collected clinical data.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)769-777
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónPalliative Medicine
Volumen20
N.º8
DOI
EstadoPublished - 2006

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: Testing the methodology'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto