Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: A stronger role for justice

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

33 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 pandemic and the history of debate about balancing equity and efficiency in resource allocation do not support this assertion. I distinguish a number of concerns with justice and balancing considerations that should play a role in critical care triage policy, focusing on discrimination and on fundamental egalitarian and social justice concerns.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)526-530
Número de páginas5
PublicaciónJournal of Medical Ethics
Volumen46
N.º8
DOI
EstadoPublished - ago. 1 2020

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: A stronger role for justice'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto