Resumen
Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 pandemic and the history of debate about balancing equity and efficiency in resource allocation do not support this assertion. I distinguish a number of concerns with justice and balancing considerations that should play a role in critical care triage policy, focusing on discrimination and on fundamental egalitarian and social justice concerns.
Idioma original | English |
---|---|
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 526-530 |
Número de páginas | 5 |
Publicación | Journal of Medical Ethics |
Volumen | 46 |
N.º | 8 |
DOI | |
Estado | Published - ago. 1 2020 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Health(social science)
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Health Policy