Two phosphate taRGets in end-stage renal disease trial (TARGET): A randomized controlled trial

Ron Wald, Christian G. Rabbat, Louis Girard, Amit X. Garg, Karthik Tennankore, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Andrew Smyth, Andrea Rathe-Skafel, Peggy Gao, Andrea Mazzetti, Jackie Bosch, Andrew T. Yan, Patrick Parfrey, Braden J. Manns, Michael Walsh

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

32 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background and objectives Hyperphosphatemia is common among recipients of maintenance dialysis and is associated with a higher risk of mortality and cardiovascular events. A large randomized trial is needed to determine whether lowering phosphate concentrations with binders improves patient-important outcomes. To inform such an effort we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We conducted a randomized controlled trial of prevalent hemodialysis recipients already receiving calcium carbonate as a phosphate binder at five Canadian centers between March 31, 2014 and October 2, 2014. Participants were randomly allocated to 26 weeks of an intensive phosphate goal of 2.33–4.66 mg/dl (0.75–1.50 mmol/L) or a liberalized target of 6.20–7.75 mg/dl (2.00–2.50 mmol/L) by titrating calcium carbonate using a dosing nomogram. The primary outcome was the difference in the change in serum phosphate from randomization to 26 weeks. Results Fifty-three participants were randomized to the intensive group and 51 to the liberalized group. The median (interquartile range) daily dose of elemental calcium at 26 weeks was 1800 (1275–3000) mg in the intensive group, and 0 (0–500) mg in the liberalized group. The mean (SD) serum phosphate at 26 weeks was 4.53 (1.12) mg/dl (1.46 [0.36] mmol/L) in the intensive group and 6.05 (1.40) mg/dl (1.95 [0.45] mmol/L) in the liberalized group. Phosphate concentration in the intensive group declined by 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.74) mg/dl (0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.56] mmol/L) compared with the liberalized group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the risk of hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, parathyroidectomy, or major vascular events. Conclusions It is feasible to achieve and maintain a difference in serum phosphate concentrations in hemodialysis recipients by titrating calcium carbonate. A large trial is needed to determine if targeting a lower serum phosphate concentration improves patient-important outcomes.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)965-973
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
Volumen12
N.º6
DOI
EstadoPublished - 2017

Nota bibliográfica

Funding Information:
The authors warmly appreciate the dedication of our patient participants and local research staff without whom this trial could not be completed. We are grateful for the support of the Canadian Nephrology Trials Network. This work was funded by an operating grant provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. M.W. was supported by a New Investigator’s Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. A.X.G. was supported by the Dr. Adam Linton Chair in Kidney Health Analytics.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Two phosphate taRGets in end-stage renal disease trial (TARGET): A randomized controlled trial'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto