TY - JOUR
T1 - WILL (When to Induce Labour to Limit risk in pregnancy hypertension)
T2 - a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic
AU - the WILL Trial Study Group
AU - Magee, Laura A.
AU - Tohill, Sue
AU - Kirkham, Katie
AU - Evans, Ruth
AU - Gkini, Eleni
AU - Moakes, Catherine A.
AU - Stubbs, Clive
AU - Thornton, Jim
AU - von Dadelszen, Peter
AU - Brocklehurst, Peter
AU - Chappell, Lucy
AU - Dorling, Jon
AU - Green, Marcus
AU - Hardy, Pollyanna
AU - Hutcheon, Jennifer
AU - Moakes, Catherine
AU - Mol, Ben
AU - Morris, Katie
AU - Riley, Paul
AU - Roberts, Tracy
AU - Scott, Janet
AU - Singer, Joel
AU - Unstead-Joss, Ruth
AU - Wade, Julie
AU - Mol, Ben W.
AU - Draycott, Tim
AU - MacLennan, Graeme
AU - MacKillop, Lucy
AU - Mannix, Paul
AU - Elbourne, Diana
AU - Groen, Henk
AU - Murdoch, Edile
AU - Stock, Sarah
AU - Bhuiya, Sumita
AU - Nallapeta, Soumendra
AU - Dooks, Emma
AU - Packham, Sophie
AU - Whitehouse, Diane
AU - O’Hara, Chloe
AU - Weston, Connie
AU - Mellers, Diane
AU - Brittain, Lesley
AU - Adams, Phern
AU - Shakespeare, Rebecca
AU - Kakara, Sudeepthi
AU - Wright, Janet
AU - Mighell, Amal
AU - Syson, Jennifer
AU - Swettenham, Kari
AU - Eedle, Jenny
N1 - Funding Information:
The WILL Trial Study Group for providing feedback and support to the paper. This study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [Health Technology Assessment programme (16/167/123)]. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. WILL Trial Study Group From Clinical Investigator, Co-investigator and Trial Management Groups Laura A. Magee (Chief Investigator), Peter Brocklehurst, Lucy Chappell, Jon Dorling, Ruth Evans, Eleni Gkini, Marcus Green, Pollyanna Hardy, Jennifer Hutcheon, Katie Kirkham, Catherine Moakes, Ben Mol, Katie Morris, Paul Riley, Tracy Roberts, Janet Scott, Joel Singer, Clive Stubbs, Jim Thornton, Sue Tohill, Ruth Unstead-Joss, Peter von Dadelszen, Julie Wade.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: As a pragmatic randomised timing-of-birth trial, WILL adapted its trial procedures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These are reviewed here to inform post-pandemic trial methodology. Methods: The trial (internal pilot) paused in March 2020, re-opened in July 2020, and is currently recruiting in 37 UK NHS consultant-led maternity units. We evaluated pandemic adaptations made to WILL processes and surveyed sites for their views of these changes (20 sites, videoconference). Results: Despite 88% of sites favouring an electronic investigator site file (ISF), information technology requirements and clinical trial unit (CTU) operating procedures mandated the ongoing use of paper ISFs; site start-up delays resulted from restricted access to the CTU. Site initiation visits (SIVs) were conducted remotely; 50% of sites preferred remote SIVs and 44% felt that it was trial-dependent, while few preferred SIVs in-person as standard procedure. The Central team felt remote SIVs provided scheduling and attendance flexibility (for sites and trial staff), the option of recording discussions for missing or future staff, improved efficiency by having multiple sites attend, and time and cost savings; the negative impact on rapport-building and interaction was partially mitigated over time with more familiarity with technology and new ways-of-working. Two methods of remote consent were developed and used by 30/37 sites and for 54/156 recruits. Most (86%) sites using remote consenting felt it improved recruitment. For remote data monitoring (5 sites), advantages were primarily for the monitor (e.g. flexibility, no time constraints, reduced cost), and disadvantages primarily for the sites (e.g. document and access preparation, attendance at a follow-up meeting), but 81% of sites desired having the option of remote monitoring post-pandemic. Conclusions: COVID adaptations to WILL trial processes improved the flexibility of trial delivery, for Central and site staff, and participants. Flexibility to use these strategies should be retained post-pandemic. Trial registration: ISRCTN77258279. Registered on 05 December 2018.
AB - Background: As a pragmatic randomised timing-of-birth trial, WILL adapted its trial procedures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These are reviewed here to inform post-pandemic trial methodology. Methods: The trial (internal pilot) paused in March 2020, re-opened in July 2020, and is currently recruiting in 37 UK NHS consultant-led maternity units. We evaluated pandemic adaptations made to WILL processes and surveyed sites for their views of these changes (20 sites, videoconference). Results: Despite 88% of sites favouring an electronic investigator site file (ISF), information technology requirements and clinical trial unit (CTU) operating procedures mandated the ongoing use of paper ISFs; site start-up delays resulted from restricted access to the CTU. Site initiation visits (SIVs) were conducted remotely; 50% of sites preferred remote SIVs and 44% felt that it was trial-dependent, while few preferred SIVs in-person as standard procedure. The Central team felt remote SIVs provided scheduling and attendance flexibility (for sites and trial staff), the option of recording discussions for missing or future staff, improved efficiency by having multiple sites attend, and time and cost savings; the negative impact on rapport-building and interaction was partially mitigated over time with more familiarity with technology and new ways-of-working. Two methods of remote consent were developed and used by 30/37 sites and for 54/156 recruits. Most (86%) sites using remote consenting felt it improved recruitment. For remote data monitoring (5 sites), advantages were primarily for the monitor (e.g. flexibility, no time constraints, reduced cost), and disadvantages primarily for the sites (e.g. document and access preparation, attendance at a follow-up meeting), but 81% of sites desired having the option of remote monitoring post-pandemic. Conclusions: COVID adaptations to WILL trial processes improved the flexibility of trial delivery, for Central and site staff, and participants. Flexibility to use these strategies should be retained post-pandemic. Trial registration: ISRCTN77258279. Registered on 05 December 2018.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140307279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85140307279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13063-022-06834-4
DO - 10.1186/s13063-022-06834-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 36271441
AN - SCOPUS:85140307279
SN - 1745-6215
VL - 23
JO - Trials
JF - Trials
IS - 1
M1 - 884
ER -