TY - JOUR
T1 - 2021 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations
AU - Summary From the Basic Life Support
AU - Advanced Life Support
AU - Neonatal Life Support
AU - Education, Implementation, and Teams
AU - First Aid Task Forces
AU - the COVID-19 Working Group
AU - Wyckoff, Myra H.
AU - Singletary, Eunice M.
AU - Soar, Jasmeet
AU - Olasveengen, Theresa M.
AU - Greif, Robert
AU - Liley, Helen G.
AU - Zideman, David
AU - Bhanji, Farhan
AU - Andersen, Lars W.
AU - Avis, Suzanne R.
AU - Aziz, Khalid
AU - Bendall, Jason C.
AU - Berry, David C.
AU - Borra, Vere
AU - Böttiger, Bernd W.
AU - Bradley, Richard
AU - Bray, Janet E.
AU - Breckwoldt, Jan
AU - Carlson, Jestin N.
AU - Cassan, Pascal
AU - Castrén, Maaret
AU - Chang, Wei Tien
AU - Charlton, Nathan P.
AU - Cheng, Adam
AU - Chung, Sung Phil
AU - Costa-Nobre, Daniela T.
AU - Dainty, Katie N.
AU - Davis, Peter G.
AU - de Almeida, Maria Fernanda
AU - de Caen, Allan R.
AU - de Paiva, Edison F.
AU - Deakin, Charles D.
AU - Djärv, Therese
AU - Douma, Matthew J.
AU - Drennan, Ian R.
AU - Duff, Jonathan P.
AU - Eastwood, Kathryn J.
AU - El-Naggar, Walid
AU - Epstein, Jonathan L.
AU - Escalante, Raffo
AU - Fabres, Jorge G.
AU - Fawke, Joe
AU - Finn, Judith C.
AU - Foglia, Elizabeth E.
AU - Folke, Fredrik
AU - Freeman, Karoline
AU - Gilfoyle, Elaine
AU - Goolsby, Craig A.
AU - Grove, Amy
AU - Guinsburg, Ruth
N1 - Funding Information:
NIH (PI on an NIH research grant to study post–cardiac arrest management)*
Funding Information:
Laerdal Foundation (unrestricted research project grant)*
Funding Information:
National Institute for Health Research (fund ing to institution to con duct research in cardiac arrest)†; British Heart Foundation (funding to institution to support OHCAO registry)†; Resuscitation Council UK (funding to institu tion to support OHCAO registry)†
Funding Information:
Numerous unrestricted academic research grants (funding for aca demic research)†
Funding Information:
Novo Nordisk research grant (research grant in resuscitation)*; Laerdal Foundation Research Grant (unrestricted re search grant for excellence in resuscitation science)*
Funding Information:
Canadian Institutes for Health Research (research grant to evalu ate aerosol box use for COVID-19)†; INSPIRE Network (research grant to evaluate aerosol box use for COVID-19)†
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Heart Association, Inc.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.
AB - The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125554156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125554156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001017
DO - 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001017
M3 - Article
C2 - 34813356
AN - SCOPUS:85125554156
SN - 0009-7322
VL - 145
SP - E645-E721
JO - Circulation
JF - Circulation
IS - 9
ER -