2021 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations

Summary From the Basic Life Support, Advanced Life Support, Neonatal Life Support, Education, Implementation, and Teams, First Aid Task Forces, the COVID-19 Working Group

Résultat de recherche: Articleexamen par les pairs

85 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)E645-E721
JournalCirculation
Volume145
Numéro de publication9
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - 2022

Note bibliographique

Funding Information:
NIH (PI on an NIH research grant to study post–cardiac arrest management)*

Funding Information:
Laerdal Foundation (unrestricted research project grant)*

Funding Information:
National Institute for Health Research (fund ing to institution to con duct research in cardiac arrest)†; British Heart Foundation (funding to institution to support OHCAO registry)†; Resuscitation Council UK (funding to institu tion to support OHCAO registry)†

Funding Information:
Numerous unrestricted academic research grants (funding for aca demic research)†

Funding Information:
Novo Nordisk research grant (research grant in resuscitation)*; Laerdal Foundation Research Grant (unrestricted re search grant for excellence in resuscitation science)*

Funding Information:
Canadian Institutes for Health Research (research grant to evalu ate aerosol box use for COVID-19)†; INSPIRE Network (research grant to evaluate aerosol box use for COVID-19)†

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Heart Association, Inc.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Review

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche '2021 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer