Résumé
Objectives: Although multiple causes of therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been identified, few studies have addressed the behavioural aspects of treatment-intensification decisions among persons with type 2 diabetes (PwT2DM) and general practitioners/family practitioners (GPFPs). Methods: A quantitative online survey was developed to capture from 300 PwT2DM and 100 GPFPs the following information: 1) perspectives on shared decision-making (SDM) related to treatment intensification, using the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire and the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire—physician version; 2) intentions to intensify treatments, using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB); and 3) preferred strategies to overcome causes of therapeutic inertia in T2DM. Regression methods were applied post hoc to examine correlations with SDM scores, behavioural intentions and behaviours. Results: SDM scores showed a significantly lower level of perceived involvement in decision-making related to treatment intensification among PwT2DM compared with GPFPs. The TPB identified that, for PwT2DM, attitudes, perceived behavioural control and age were associated with variation in intention to intensify treatment and, for GPFPs, perceived behavioural control and not being in a shared/group practice were associated with intentions to intensify treatment. PwT2DM behaviour, measured as hesitancy to intensify treatment, was associated with age. PwT2DM want more information to become more comfortable with the treatment decision-making process, whereas GPFPs desired support from other health professionals, and more time to address issues among PwT2DM. Conclusions: Strategies directed at providing GPFPs with tools/approaches to increase PwT2DM involvement in the decision-making process, such as behavioural coaching, decision aids and goal setting, may increase acceptance of treatment intensification, leading to a reduction in therapeutic inertia in T2DM.
Langue d'origine | English |
---|---|
Journal | Canadian Journal of Diabetes |
DOI | |
Statut de publication | Accepted/In press - 2022 |
Note bibliographique
Funding Information:The authors thank the patient and GPFP survey respondents for participating in this study; Veronica Carson of Novo Nordisk Canada, Inc, for advice in defining a study approach and parameters; and Marc Duclos, Drew Neish and Ishan Shankar of IQVIA for their assistance with statistical analyses. This study was funded by Novo Nordisk Canada, Inc. N.I. holds a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Implementation of Evidence-based Practice.
Funding Information:
The authors thank the patient and GPFP survey respondents for participating in this study; Veronica Carson of Novo Nordisk Canada, Inc, for advice in defining a study approach and parameters; and Marc Duclos, Drew Neish and Ishan Shankar of IQVIA for their assistance with statistical analyses. This study was funded by Novo Nordisk Canada, Inc . N.I. holds a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Implementation of Evidence-based Practice.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Internal Medicine
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Endocrinology
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article