TY - JOUR
T1 - Anticoagulation Management Pre- and Post Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
T2 - A Survey of Canadian Centres
AU - Mardigyan, Vartan
AU - Verma, Atul
AU - Birnie, David
AU - Guerra, Peter
AU - Redfearn, Damian
AU - Becker, Giuliano
AU - Champagne, Jean
AU - Sapp, John
AU - Gula, Lorne
AU - Parkash, Ratika
AU - Macle, Laurent
AU - Crystal, Eugene
AU - O'Hara, Gilles
AU - Khaykin, Yaariv
AU - Sturmer, Marcio
AU - Veenhuyzen, George D.
AU - Greiss, Isabelle
AU - Sarrazin, Jean Francois
AU - Mangat, Iqwal
AU - Novak, Paul
AU - Skanes, Allan
AU - Roux, Jean Francois
AU - Chauhan, Vijay
AU - Hadjis, Tom
AU - Morillo, Carlos A.
AU - Essebag, Vidal
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Essebag is the recipient of a Clinician Scientist award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).
PY - 2013/2
Y1 - 2013/2
N2 - Background Anticoagulation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is crucial to minimize the risk of thromboembolic complications. There are broad ranges of approaches to anticoagulation management pre and post AF ablation procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the anticoagulation strategies currently in use in patients peri- and post AF ablation in Canada. Methods A Web-based national survey of electrophysiologists performing AF ablation in Canada collected data regarding anticoagulation practice prior to ablation, periprocedural bridging, and duration of postablation anticoagulation. Results The survey was completed by 36 (97%) of the 37 electrophysiologists performing AF ablation across Canada. Prior to AF ablation, 58% of electrophysiologists started anticoagulation for patients with paroxysmal AF CHADS 2 scores of 0 to 1, 92% for paroxysmal AF CHADS 2 scores ≥ 2, 83% for persistent AF CHADS 2 scores of 0 to 1, and 97% for persistent AF CHADS 2 scores ≥ 2. For patients with CHADS 2 0 to 1, warfarin was continued for at least 3 months by most physicians (89% for paroxysmal and 94% for persistent AF). For patients with CHADS 2 ≥ 2 and with no recurrence of AF at 1 year post ablation, 89% of physicians continued warfarin. Conclusions Although guidelines recommend long-term anticoagulation in patients with CHADS 2 ≥ 2, 11% of physicians would discontinue warfarin in patients with no evidence of recurrent AF 1 year post successful ablation. Significant heterogeneity exists regarding periprocedural anticoagulation management in clinical practice. Clinical trial evidence is required to guide optimal periprocedural anticoagulation and therapeutic decisions regarding long-term anticoagulation after an apparently successful catheter ablation for AF.
AB - Background Anticoagulation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is crucial to minimize the risk of thromboembolic complications. There are broad ranges of approaches to anticoagulation management pre and post AF ablation procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the anticoagulation strategies currently in use in patients peri- and post AF ablation in Canada. Methods A Web-based national survey of electrophysiologists performing AF ablation in Canada collected data regarding anticoagulation practice prior to ablation, periprocedural bridging, and duration of postablation anticoagulation. Results The survey was completed by 36 (97%) of the 37 electrophysiologists performing AF ablation across Canada. Prior to AF ablation, 58% of electrophysiologists started anticoagulation for patients with paroxysmal AF CHADS 2 scores of 0 to 1, 92% for paroxysmal AF CHADS 2 scores ≥ 2, 83% for persistent AF CHADS 2 scores of 0 to 1, and 97% for persistent AF CHADS 2 scores ≥ 2. For patients with CHADS 2 0 to 1, warfarin was continued for at least 3 months by most physicians (89% for paroxysmal and 94% for persistent AF). For patients with CHADS 2 ≥ 2 and with no recurrence of AF at 1 year post ablation, 89% of physicians continued warfarin. Conclusions Although guidelines recommend long-term anticoagulation in patients with CHADS 2 ≥ 2, 11% of physicians would discontinue warfarin in patients with no evidence of recurrent AF 1 year post successful ablation. Significant heterogeneity exists regarding periprocedural anticoagulation management in clinical practice. Clinical trial evidence is required to guide optimal periprocedural anticoagulation and therapeutic decisions regarding long-term anticoagulation after an apparently successful catheter ablation for AF.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872680859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872680859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.04.013
DO - 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.04.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 22840300
AN - SCOPUS:84872680859
SN - 0828-282X
VL - 29
SP - 219
EP - 223
JO - Canadian Journal of Cardiology
JF - Canadian Journal of Cardiology
IS - 2
ER -