TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of eating disorders with the diabetes eating problems survey - revised (DEPS-R) in a representative sample of insulin-treated diabetic patients
T2 - A validation study in Italy
AU - Pinna, Federica
AU - Diana, Enrica
AU - Sanna, Lucia
AU - Deiana, Valeria
AU - Manchia, Mirko
AU - Nicotra, Eraldo
AU - Fiorillo, Andrea
AU - Albert, Umberto
AU - Nivoli, Alessandra
AU - Volpe, Umberto
AU - Atti, Anna Rita
AU - Ferrari, Silvia
AU - Medda, Federica
AU - Atzeni, Maria Gloria
AU - Manca, Daniela
AU - Mascia, Elisa
AU - Farci, Fernando
AU - Ghiani, Mariangela
AU - Cau, Rossella
AU - Tuveri, Marta
AU - Cossu, Efisio
AU - Loy, Elena
AU - Mereu, Alessandra
AU - Mariotti, Stefano
AU - Carpiniello, Bernardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s).
PY - 2017/7/19
Y1 - 2017/7/19
N2 - Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate in a sample of insulin-treated diabetic patients, with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, the psychometric characteristics of the Italian version of the DEPS-R scale, a diabetes-specific self-report questionnaire used to analyze disordered eating behaviors. Methods: The study was performed on 211 consecutive insulin-treated diabetic patients attending two specialist centers. Lifetime prevalence of eating disorders (EDs) according to DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria were assessed by means of the Module H of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis I Disorder and the Module H modified, according to DSM-5 criteria. The following questionnaires were administered: DEPS-R and the Eating Disorder Inventory - 3 (EDI-3). Test/retest reproducibility was assessed on a subgroup of 70 patients. The factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of DEPS-R were assessed. Results: Overall, 21.8% of the sample met criteria for at least one DSM-5 diagnosis of ED. A "clinical risk" of ED was observed in 13.3% of the sample. Females displayed higher scores at DEPS-R, a higher percentage of at least one diagnosis of ED and a higher clinical risk for ED. A high level of reproducibility and homogeneity of the scale were revealed. A significant correlation was detected between DEPS-R and the 3 ED risk scales of EDI-3. Conclusions: The data confirmed the overall reliability and validity of the scale. In view of the significance and implications of EDs in diabetic patients, it should be conducted a more extensive investigation of the phenomenon by means of evaluation instruments of demonstrated validity and reliability.
AB - Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate in a sample of insulin-treated diabetic patients, with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, the psychometric characteristics of the Italian version of the DEPS-R scale, a diabetes-specific self-report questionnaire used to analyze disordered eating behaviors. Methods: The study was performed on 211 consecutive insulin-treated diabetic patients attending two specialist centers. Lifetime prevalence of eating disorders (EDs) according to DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria were assessed by means of the Module H of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis I Disorder and the Module H modified, according to DSM-5 criteria. The following questionnaires were administered: DEPS-R and the Eating Disorder Inventory - 3 (EDI-3). Test/retest reproducibility was assessed on a subgroup of 70 patients. The factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of DEPS-R were assessed. Results: Overall, 21.8% of the sample met criteria for at least one DSM-5 diagnosis of ED. A "clinical risk" of ED was observed in 13.3% of the sample. Females displayed higher scores at DEPS-R, a higher percentage of at least one diagnosis of ED and a higher clinical risk for ED. A high level of reproducibility and homogeneity of the scale were revealed. A significant correlation was detected between DEPS-R and the 3 ED risk scales of EDI-3. Conclusions: The data confirmed the overall reliability and validity of the scale. In view of the significance and implications of EDs in diabetic patients, it should be conducted a more extensive investigation of the phenomenon by means of evaluation instruments of demonstrated validity and reliability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027109643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027109643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12888-017-1434-8
DO - 10.1186/s12888-017-1434-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 28724422
AN - SCOPUS:85027109643
SN - 1471-244X
VL - 17
JO - BMC Psychiatry
JF - BMC Psychiatry
IS - 1
M1 - 262
ER -